Install the new Firefox
0 Roue
- Belonging to a different category, that of monetary manipulation, this news just came in - although it seems to have been 'announced' in the last 2 or 3 years : http://www.ilmattino.it/PRIMOPIANO/CRONACA/bancomat-pagamento-obbligatorio/notizie/771737.shtmlVan: evola_as_he_is@... [evola_as_he_is]
Verzonden: vrijdag 27 juni 2014 15:52
Aan: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.comStill, we had never seen such a suggestive compass (2.53) ; the least one can say is that it is graphic.
explained in the expanded French version of ‘An Eye Is Not Always An Eye’ at https://elementsdeducationraciale.wordpress.com/2013/03/19/mon-nom-est-personne/, most of those symbols, whose meaning the common people no longer understand, at least consciously, hide other symbols, which may act subliminally, especially since the meaning of their outer shell is not perceived consciously ; obviously, the mind is more exposed to outer forms he does not recognise, identify.
The clown you refer to did claim that “3,500 women in Normandy were sexually abused”. He conveniently, and we would say, by lack of a better term - which does not exist in our languages - cynically forgot to mention by whom: http://www.democratic-republicans.us/english/english-mass-rape-of-french-women-by-gi-greatest-generation-in-1944 ; see also http://researchlist.blogspot.fr/2011/07/rape-and-killings-after-world-war-ii.html ((this study does not take into account the campaign of rapes in which the French expeditionary force, consisting of Moroccan colonial troops, Algerian soldiers, Tunisian and Senegalese riflemen, covered by the highest ranks of the military as well as by de Gaulle, were engaged, both in Italy and in Germany, in the aftermath of WW2)
- J. Evola was neither the first not the last to claim that the United States and Russia were essentially two faces of the same coin, but he identified exactly, behind ideological disguises, what made them convergent: the fact that in both individual and collective life the economic factor, called Capitalism in the former, Socialism, in the latter, is the most important, real, and decisive one. We are not sure whether this has been made clear in the writings of Marxist theoreticians.In any case, both economic systems are in the process of merging in a form in which the central government controls most of the capital, industry, natural resources, etc., a form which, while it was designated with a term in the XIXth century, only started to spread in European countries in the aftermath of WW2, when all conditions were gathered for its development. This term is « State Capitalism ». It is misleading, in that the capital, the industry, etc, are now actually owned, not by the central government, but by the forces which are behind it and which, nowadays, control it fully, that is, the international high finance. We are not sure whether this was made clear by Lenin or any other Marxist theoretician. The correct term is simply ‘Communism’. In societies such as the current European ones, are the professional loan-takers of which most of the population is made up, especially in France, which became the laboratory of ‘State capitalism’ in Western Europe (see http://www.vedegylet.hu/fejkrit/szvggyujt/schmidt_frenchCapitalism.pdf), after de Gaulle put his Communist allies at the head of most French institutions and big firms, sure that they are really private owners ?Communism, in line with early Christianity, advocates the substitution of private property for collective property, including the collectivisation of the means of production and the distribution of consumer goods according to individual needs ; and, as is known, needs can be created at will ; for one to be able to satisfy one’s needs, one needs a salary, or, at least, some source of income ; since current salaries allow less and less loan-takers to satisfy less and less of their needs, a solution will have to be found, and has actually been found, to “support consumption” : it consists in passing laws that make the purchase of certain things and the use of certain services compulsory, preferably under humanitarian or utilitarian pretexts. A few years ago, “The Interdepartmental Committee on Road Safety Board… decided to make the presence of a safety vest and a warning triangle (in addition to warning lights) in every vehicle compulsory.” Non-compliance with these regulations results in a 135 € fine. “Many other European countries have already adopted this measure. The goal is to ensure the users’ safety in case of an emergency stop.” They care for you. They also care for the only authorised ‘French’ manufacturer of safety vests and of warning triangles, which turned out to have been made in China, and, for some of them, were taken off the market a few weeks after having been offered for sale, since they proved to be defective. Hundreds of similar cases evidencing the sprawl of ‘State Capitalism’ could be listed. The obligation, reported at http://www.ilmattino.it/PRIMOPIANO/CRONACA/bancomat-pagamento-obbligatorio/notizie/771737.shtml, for self-employed workers and small companies in Italy to accept electronic payments for goods or services costing over 30 €, and, therefore to pay a fortune to rent an EPT, is another one.Consuming loan-takers need not worry: the amount of the rental will be passed on to goods and services.
- "Suppress cash to boost growth. [...] A good way to restore growth in a context of crisis. Assuming that the ECB could begin a significant decline in rates, it could infuse inflation with negative interest rates. That means that a sum of money placed in an account would no longer be profitable but cost money to its owner. Now, if this provision is taken when cash is in circulation, "investors will hoard cash to avoid penalties." On the contrary, in a society without cash, money will "benefit to the real economy", driven by consumption needed to avoid bank penalties."
http://www.lefigaro.fr/argent/2014/01/12/05010-20140112ARTFIG00103-une-societe-sans-cash-est-elle-possible.php
In fact, the four prerequisites to the realization of this "high" finance's objective have already been put in place at least partially:
-European countries are progressively banning cash, establishing the absolute centralization of virtual money in banks or other organisms of centralization of virtual money.
-The BCE has already begun to impose loans with negative interest rates: http://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/html/faqinterestrates.en.html , http://www.ecb.europa.eu/home/html/faqinterestrates.fr.html .
-The "high" finance's stooges who are at the "head" of the alleged european "governments" have already prepared the enforcement of the taxation of bank accounts and, in France, have already tried to establish it: http://goldsilverworlds.com/money-currency/imf-discusses-a-super-tax-of-10-on-all-savings-in-eurozone/ .-The importation of tens of millions of extra-european aliens and the birth of tens of millions of physically and mentally degenerated so-called "Whites" european, whose victory of National-Socialist Germany would have respectively prevented the invasion and the birth and so their endless exponential growth, in an imperial state based on patriotism, hierarchy, patriarchy, racism, nordism, autarky, personal austerity and eugenics.
They care for you.
- In ‘The Reign of Quantity’, Guénon suggests that there may be“a fairly close connection between the destruction of the Order of Templars and the alteration of the coinage” by Philip the Fair. This suggestion is quite paradoxical, since, on the one hand, as already seen, the accusations of counterfeiting made against the French king are largely unfounded, and, on the other hand, if any of these is guilty of counterfeiting in the broad sense of the term, the Templars are, who developed banking as we know it today, with its deposit accounts, its credit based monetary transactions, and its cheques payable in any country for a commission. Indeed, as pointed out by E. Lord (2013), one of the ways in which the Templars profited from the accounts was by making the money deposited on them work for them on paper through lending it on letters of credit. The Templars were those who introduced, if not ‘paper money’, already invented in China, at least the concept of it, in Europe. What is ‘paper money' in this respect, if not a transitional support to virtual money ?
Writing decades before the creation of electronic currency, R. Guénon noted, far more accurately : “since money lost all guarantee of a superior order, it has seen its own actual quantitative value, or what is called in the jargon of the economists its ‘purchasing power', becoming ceaselessly less and less, so that it can be imagined that, when it arrives at a limit that is getting ever nearer, it will have lost every justification for its existence, even all merely ‘practical' or ‘material' justification, and that it will disappear of itself, so to speak, from human existence.” There is however a far more practical reason for the planned obsoleteness of paper money: there is no longer enough cash - paper-money- in circulation to match the “digits on the screen”. It has been estimated that, if all clients with more than 20 to 30 € on their bank accounts, were to be allowed to withdraw their whole balance, they would each receive at best precisely 20 to 30 € in cash. ECB’s hot air is not going to make any difference.
For them, “real economy” means “virtual economy”, and “virtual economy” is precisely what they are in charge of implementing, together with other related agencies. In most “Western countries”, the economy is increasingly ‘tertiarised’, and the computerisation of this third sector, tailored to meet women’s needs, and, as a matter of fact, filled with them, goes hand in hand with the dematerialisation (this term is not to be taken in its economic sense here) of the economy, of whatever may be left of it.
What J. Evola pointed out half a century ago on economy is still valid. Indeed, it is still, and more than ever, “possible to speak of a demonic nature of the economy, because in both individual and collective life the economic factor is the most important, real, and decisive one”, insofar as it is understood that what we are now faced with, in “Western countries”, which can no longer be called “industrialised”, is an increasingly virtual economy. It is only a matter of time, and of space, too, before so-called “emerging countries”, in which the first and the second sectors are still strong, catch up, that is, technologically, since, mentally, Yellows, cerebral as they are, are quite ready.
Moreover, “the tendency to converge every value and interest on the economic and productive plane is” less and less “perceived by Western man as an unprecedented aberration, but instead as something normal and natural, and not as an eventual necessity, but as something that must be accepted, willed, developed, and praised.” The “Western man” has become an overseas Chinese merchant, not so much financially as mentally.
In “Western countries”, however, “work” is no longer “one of those sacred cows and intangible entities that modern man dares only to praise and exalt.” Arguably, it is hard to glorify work in societies with very high unemployment rates, where every effort is make to make them even higher, to discourage people from working, and an increasingly number of jobs, created as they are in the so-called “digital economy”, are unproductive, pertaining to parasitism. Sport has replaced work in the plebeian fantasy (in France, 12/13% of the labour force, if it may be called that, lives on sport).
To “work” in the “virtual economy” implies qualities, or, as they say these days, “skills” which no man worth of the name can ever possess, and which are on the contrary congenial to what L.F. Céline termed “la pourriture en suspens” (“suspended rot”).
evola_as_he_is@{{emailDomain}}