Attention: Starting December 14, 2019 Yahoo
Groups will no longer host user created content on its sites. New
content can no longer be uploaded after October 28, 2019.
Sending/Receiving email functionality is not going away, you can
continue to communicate via any email client with your group members. Learn More
- In addendum:A slight change of theme, but the same show http://www.francetvinfo.fr/faits-divers/tueries/fusillade-au-musee-juif-de-bruxelles/attaques-a-bruxelles-l-histoire-belge-marquee-par-plusieurs-vagues-terroristes_1370279.html#xtref=https://news.google.com
From: g.vdheide@...
To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [evola_as_he_is] Re: The Race of the Fleeing Man (http://mileswmathis.com/)
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2016 18:22:15 +0100(An interesting report that sums up the current state of affairs with regard to the European Union and foreign activities on European soil. The annexed part can be read at the original address http://www.justresponse.net/DougalWatt20Aug02.html. We put in bold the most striking parts. A related file is http://www.justresponse.net/DougalWatt3Sep02.htmlCIA and freemasons among dark forces in Europe: an exclusive JUST Response report from the Dougal Watt Dossier.
'Whistleblower' Robert Dougal Watt speaks outMr Michel HERVÉ
Secretary General
European Court of Auditors
Subject: further to my letters of 17 June and 8 July
For your information, please find in the attached Annex material of relevance to my letter of 17 June. Essentially, this material supports the plausibility of the central hypothesis presented in that letter.Firstly, the material presented demonstrates that concern for one’s personal safety when querying official explanations for any past mafia-related death is symptomatic of common-sense rather than paranoia. This is particularly true given the apparent public distance between the institution and myself. When the circumstances of the “suicide” in London of Roberto Calvi were officially re-examined, several years after the event, the British authorities were careful to minimise the exposure to risk of all those involved in the re-examination.Secondly, evidence is presented of the penetration by freemasonry of the European institutions, and Member State administrations; and accounts of the consequential corruption in France, Belgium and Italy.Thirdly, historical evidence is presented of the key role played by the United States, and its intelligence community in particular, in the post-war formation of the “Europe Community”. As the leading historian (in English) has concluded, “Viewed from Europe, the most striking aspect… is the extent to which officials working for European reconstruction and unification shared the experience of wartime intelligence, special operations and resistance. European unity had taken root in wartime resistance movements. These links with clandestine organisations continued into the post-war period. The emerging European Economic Community and the growing Western intelligence community overlapped to a considerable degree.”Fourthly, evidence is presented of more recent CIA intervention in domestic Italian politics; of the Agency’s role with regard to the P2 masonic lodge; and of the lodge’s associated criminal and terrorist activities.Fifthly, evidence is presented of contemporary CIA spying on the European Institutions.Sixthly, by way of balance, evidence is presented of KGB activities in Europe during the Cold War period. At least some of the fears of US agencies with regard to clandestine Communist activity were well founded, offering corresponding justification for covert US activity in Europe. Essentially, just as the United States endeavoured to encourage Western European unity, so the Soviet Union endeavoured to keep the states of Western Europe divided.Seventhly, evidence is presented demonstrating the establishment under NATO auspices of a Europe-wide network of “Gladio” or “Stay-behind” forces; and the linkages made between the personnel/equipment of such forces and terrorist atrocities in Italy and Belgium during the 1980s. The revelation in the early 1990s of these clandestine forces, and such linkages, gave rise to a strongly-worded condemnatory resolution of the European Parliament.The evidence presented in the attached Annex thus supports the plausibility of the central hypothesis of my letter of 17 June. Again, I should like to emphasise that I have presented – and maintain – a hypothesis, and neither a conviction nor a definitive proof. The hypothesis is derived from the facts known to me; and given the significance of the potential audit findings, I believe further investigation by the Court of the matters raised is merited.Consequently, it gives me great distress to find that the Court seems, from my perspective at least, to prefer to “shoot the messenger” rather than to give consideration to the “message”. It gave, and its gives, me no pleasure to question the integrity of two senior officials with whom I have worked and/or known for many years. However, if two individuals voluntarily swear to protect their “brothers”, and their fraternal secrets, upon pain of death and dismemberment; and an analysis of the audit evidence available casts material doubt on their, and other “official” explanations offered to date; and evidence of masonic corruption in other fields of public life is well known and thoroughly documented; then I fail to understand why it must be unreasonable to assume it possible that such “brotherly” oaths might take precedence over employees’ normal duties of loyalty to their employer.Furthermore, I was astonished to receive from OLAF a fax dated 9 August stating, “Mr Michel Herve, Secretary General of the Court of Auditors, informed the European anti-fraud Office about your letter of 17/6/02”; and inviting me to contact OLAF in order to allow the Office to “complete and assess these allegations”. Given that my letter of 17 June presents allegations of serious impropriety by OLAF, committed at the highest level; and given that the Court, as a sovereign institution under the Treaty, has responsibility for reporting on the sound management of OLAF; - I regret I find your decision to pass my letter to OLAF for further investigation to be incomprehensible.With regard to your letter of 31 August, and its opening remark, “You have not answered to my letter dated 2nd July 2002”: I observe that I did reply, on 8 July, before noon, as you had requested in your letter of 2 July. I hold a fax “transmission record” which confirms the above, and confirms that your fax machine received the transmission “OK”. Furthermore, a copy of my letter to you of 8 July was included in the fax which I sent to the President of the institution’s Staff Committee on 9 July; which I asked be made available to all staff who requested access; and which I understand was submitted for your consideration.My fax of 8 July raised a number of queries with regard to your proposal to conduct a second medical examination on 23 August. I have waited patiently in the expectation of some response to my queries; to date, in vain. In view of the proximity of the proposed examination, I await your urgent response to the queries presented in my fax of 8 July.In addition, I should be grateful if you would forward the following to me: the terms of reference for the employment by the Court/Commission Medical Service of Dr John Callender; an explanation for his selection by the Court/Commission Medical Service (i.e., selection methodology, criteria, etc.); and a copy of all information which has been provided to Dr Callender by the Court/Commission Medical Service.R Dougal WATT
Auditor
20 August 2002
(on sick leave)
From: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 21:28:43 +0100
Subject: RE: [evola_as_he_is] Re: The Race of the Fleeing Man (http://mileswmathis.com/)
"The Doom of Youth: Wyndham Lewis' Conspiracy Theory" by J. Constable is a recommendable text. It attempts to give a point-by-point summary of "The Doom of Youth"."(...) The Doom of Youth must be understood as a detailed discussion of a world conspiracy.""The Doom of Youth is divided into six sections, an unnumbered introductory preamble consisting of a foreword, an introduction, a list of contents giving a chapter by chapter summary, and five numbered parts. Part I discusses the relationship of youth agitation, economics, and politics at an abstract level, parts II and III use popular sources, newspapers and magazines, to document the activities of the youth cult in the anglo-saxon world, part IV turns to middle and highbrow literature to discuss the concomitant feminisation of the male, and part V reviews the discussion and provides further examples.""Having laid out the progress and methods of the Doom of Youth we are now in a position to summarise, to raise the whisper to the level of normal statement. There is an international conspiracy of capital, largely Jewish, and almost entirely under Jewish direction, and this conspiracy stands behind the reorganisation of the Soviet Union, and also behind the various social phenomena which Lewis terms “wars”, Age-wars, Sex-wars, Race-wars. And indeed it is responsible for the “Great War” itself. These “wars” serve the purpose of destabilising the social structure of the European states, whose character is inconvenient for those who wish to produce maximally efficient industries. Perhaps, also, these conspirators are motivated by ancient political enmities as much as by the desire for profit. It is even possible to see the economics as the manifestation of a deeper political grudge, the anti-Aryan misanthropy of the Jew. Against this the Europeans have little defence. Their intellectuals are too short-sightedly selfish to intervene, and if there is any hope at all it is from a vulgarly populist movement, such as Hitler’s, which is prepared to use the same tools as the conspiracy to mobilise the peoples of Europe in self-defence.""(...) the future rulers of the world will be “male matriarchs – who in fact are physiologically male, though very feminine in outlook – not warlike masters like the Normans, or Manchus, but more like a sleek and subtle theocracy”, the reader will recall that elsewhere in this book Lewis suggests “That the Jew, according to the standards of european masculinity – if put beside a Viking or the typical warlike types of Gaul or of Germany – is feminine – that is clear enough”, and that “In a non-military race, like the jewish [...] the men are less ‘manly’ than the Nordic Blond, and the women are never so chocolate-boxily ‘feminine’ as their anglo-saxon sisters.)”"http://libellus.co.uk/uploads/jc_doom_of_youth_21_04_13.pdf
From: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 15:49:34 +0100
Subject: RE: [evola_as_he_is] Re: The Race of the Fleeing Man (http://mileswmathis.com/)
This mainly concerns his universalist and internationalist views from then on."Lewis sees the violence, irrationality, and rootlessness of American life as positive qualities; qualities not only to be valued in themselves as exuberant proliferations of the human spirit, but also to be welcomed as the birthpangs of the world society of the future, the society of “cosmic man” (by “cosmic” he means cosmopolitan or internationalist). In effect he turns on its head the negative image which so many European and American intellectuals have of America.""The essence of what Lewis says in America and Cosmic Man is that since most of us realize that permanent peace, some form of economic collectivism, and an international political community are prerequisites for human survival in the atomic age, we must venerate America and learn from it. For the United States is the nation best exemplifying in embryonic form the world order in which these things will be established. The familiar simile of the melting pot fascinates him: he sees America as “the great big promiscuous grave into which tumble, and there disintegrate, all that was formerly race, class, or nationhood.” In a remarkable chapter entitled “The Case Against Roots,” he praises rootlessness as a necessary condition of world citizenship, and points out that no one is really rooted in America, “everyone has left his roots over in Poland or Ireland, in Italy or in Russia, so we are all floating around in a rootless Elysium.” In a similar manner he views the standardization of life with its wiping out of regional peculiarities and prejudices as the forerunner of the standardization of world culture, an irreversible trend under industrialism.""Before the war Lewis had shown sympathy for fascism in his 1926 work The Art of BeingRuled ('I am not a communist; if anything I favour some form of fascism rather than communism')'' and been grouped by T. S. Eliot with a number of writers who 'incline in the direction of some kind of fascism'.He had also written two books about Hitler, which many believed meant that he supported him. In a footnote in his autobiography he was to write as follows about them in response to a comment by George Orwell in the Partisan Review (Summer, 1946): As to my books 'in favour of Hitler', I have written two books about Hitler, one when he first appeared on the scene... (in 1930) before he came to power and revealed what a lunatic he was, and the other (The Hitler Cult and How it Will End) at the time of Munich.The first book was 'in favour': though it was not the Nazi's view of the matter; the second was very much the reverse of 'in favour'. The Hitler Cult is in many ways a rewriting of the earlier Hitler with numerous points refuted which had been made on behalf of Hitler in the first book. The satirical America I Presume impressions of America published in New York in August 1940, reinforces this change of opinion by referring to Hitler as a ' barbarous little mountebank'.In the same book Lewis expressed a view which is one of the main themes of Anglosaxony, namely that whatever happened during the present war - whether or not America would enter it - 'it is of vast importance that the English-speaking peoples of the world should act in harmony'.Anglosaxony is written in three parts. The first, entitled Democracy and Fascism is a defence of the democratic ideal against criticisms from both Right and Left. Lewis stresses that he sees democracy as a 'limited, an Anglo-Saxon family affair' but he does not mean to give democracy a nationalist character. Instead he envisages it as one only among
several ways of life and not as a political system 'desirous of imposing itself upon all and sundry'."(Read further at http://www.bl.uk/eblj/1997articles/pdf/article10.pdf which continues with more relevant explanations ; those very parts however are not easily reproduced here)It must however be noted that The Art Of Being Ruled, thus far from being a balanced work, contains varying positions and statements on the subjects at hand (the breakdown of the family unit being favoured by the author, for example), which in turn are not easily summarized. Academic texts only deal indirectly with these aspects of his writings. Therefore the best sources of reference are the very writings themselves."The first of Lewis' 'Man of the World' books, The Art of Being Ruled attempts to set out the changes that were happening and were, he believed, inevitable the replacement of liberal democracy by some form of socialism (centralised and authoritarian or local and communitarian), the destruction of the nuclear family unit, the growth of corporatism, changes in gender and sexuality, these and other phenomena were not being recognised, but society would need to make choices about them, or it would sleepwalk mechanically into the future. Roughly, The Art of Being Ruled presents the issues about which choices will need to be made, and looks at their implications. In the dust-jacket it is stated that the changes analysed in the book necessitate a new, strenuousand intellectual approach to life. But Lewis began to think that, instead of adopting such a critical approach, culture at all levels ; even avant-garde culture ; was simply replicating the contemporary society's tacit ideology of fatalistic mechanical change.""A large part of The Art of Being Ruled is about the disintegration of the family, the rise of feminism, and the so-called 'sex war', which according to Lewis is a consequence of sexual inversion. Chapter X, "The Matriarchate and Feminine Ascendency", opens as follows:ALL orthodox opinion - that is, to-day, 'revolutionary' opinion either of the pure or the impure variety - is anti-man. Its terms are those of a war or insurrection still, although theoretically the war is over and the position gained. But subtly and in the nature of things, it is no longer a question of adjusting an inequality, but of advancing (as of a superior nature) the qualities of the 'down-trodden,' of the 'weaker' sex. [...] Such a war as the 'sex war,' as was to be expected, does not end in a stabilization in which the man and the woman exist on equal terms. It necessarily ends in a situation in which feminine values are predominant. (223)As an example of a book in which this tendency is noticeable, Lewis mentions "The Dominant Sex, by Matilda and Mathias Vaerting." (223) [http://library.umac.mo/ebooks/b13626103.pdf](...)(...) Part IX, Chapter III ("'Call Yourself a Man!'"). On the opening page of this chapter (Art 279), Lewis discusses the strange use of the term 'man' denoting any individual, male or female:The term MAN implies a variety of indispensable but not necessarily pleasant things, quite independently of the specific sex characters, although it can only be attached to an individual falling within the subdivision of the adult male. The identification by means of sex-character on the part of adult males has always been a source of mortification to women and children : and at the present juncture some more neutral term should be substituded for it [...] (279)(...)The position of the male to-day, and the symbolism of the word MAN, are purely artificial [...] The male has been persuaded to assume a certain onerous and disagreeable rôle with the promise of rewards - material and psychological. Women may in the first place even have put it into his head. BE A MAN! may have been, metaphorically, what Eve uttered at the critical moment in the garden of Eden. (282-3)"Men were only made into "men" with great difficulty even in primitive society: the male is not naturally "a man" any more than the woman. He has to be propped up into that position with some ingenuity, and is always likely to collapse. In : "Call Yourself a Man!" (The Art Of Being Ruled)P. S. http://mileswmathis.com contains some interesting speculations about the supposed sponsoring of the earliest modernist art salons by secret services. Thus before the so-called "Cold War" period of the 1950s and the preceeding years. But without factual material these claims remain exactly that : speculations.As for a statement made in that same context : the career of E. Pound is - indeed - notable. The claim of him not really being interned in an American prison wing after the war is simply difficult to sustain considering the many witnesses.
From: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 05:29:32 -0800
Subject: RE: [evola_as_he_is] Re: The Race of the Fleeing Man (http://mileswmathis.com/)
Please elaborate on this statement of yours: « changes in his thinking becoming especially apparent from the 1940 years and onwards. » Not that his personal case matters in the least : it is just that, if that change pertained to his most insightful views on the process of matriarcalisation of intrinsically patriarcal « Gemeinschaften », it would be indicative of a feminisation of the thought of the last men aware ofthe former process.
P.s : Bowden tended to see Fascists almost everywhere.
evola_as_he_is@{{emailDomain}}