For a scholar, MacDonald has guts : he "testified on behalf of the
historian David Irving in the unsuccessful lawsuit he brought against
Deborah Lipstadt over her description of him as a Holocaust denier.
The testimony drew on MacDonald's theories of inter-group conflict
and questioned whether Irving's book should have been dropped by St.
Martin's Press. MacDonald alleged Irving's book on Goebbels was
rescinded by St. Martin's Press not because of its scientific merit
but because of pressure from "certain Jewish ethnic activist
organizations," "newspaper columnists," and "people like Deborah
Lipstadt." MacDonald has defended himself against criticism of his
action by arguing that he acted from a concern for academic freedom
and that he would willingly testify on behalf of any Jewish scholar
subject to similar pressures for his views." (Wikipedia). More guts
than Irving who, a few months ago, has once again denied having
denied denying having denied, etc.
He does "considers the Israelite model of ethnic separatism and
eugenics as crucial for conserving Western civilization", and there
is the rub. As a matter of fact, since when have 'ethnic separatism'
and 'eugenics' been a Jewish model? Eugenics and ethnic separatism
were known to and implemented in the Aryan world far before they were
to and in the Jewish society. By hint of reading more or less
exclusively Semitic literature, goyim end up having about their
content a fixation which prevents them from seeing anything else and
from realising that most of the ideas they are led to believe are
genuinely Jewish were actually borrowed by the Jew from other
civilisations. This attitude betrays a complete inversion of values,
which is one of the main characteristics of the reign of quantity.
Would Nietzsche have considered it as being part of what he
called "transvaluation of values"?
It seems to us - yet, we may be wrong - that we published some time
ago two essays by Evola on Nietzsche in which the latter shows the
limits of Nietzschean thought, limits which, to us and to elaborate
on Evola's criticism, are due to his artistic and aesthetic
tendencies, which, as brilliantly seen by de Gobineau, are to be
brought back, when found in an individual, to Negroid elements
present in his heredity. Besides, given the end he met, it can be
wondered whether he was in a position to distinguish a healthy will-
to-power from an unhealthy will-to-power.
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "brightimperator"
<brightimperator@...> wrote:
>
> --- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, Rowan Berkeley
> <rowan.berkeley@> wrote:
> >
> > Actually, it would have made no difference if the ancient
> Israelites had been as
> > white as snow : the moment they started developing an ideology
> that runs along
> > the lines of
> >
> > "we have to work exceptionally hard to bring our Lord to power,
> world-wide, even
> > though he is of course already omnipotent, and is just pretending
> he needs our
> > help in his struggle for universal dominion, because he is
testing
> us ... "
> >
> > they were manifesting their true nature as slaves.
> >
>
> If we choose to rely on the Nietzschian analysis of the Jews (which
> I by no means dogmatically hold), it is not so unambiguous.
>
> According to Nietzsche, "First Temple" Judaism is an example of the
> healthy will-to-power:
>
> "At the time of the kings, Israel also stood in the right, that is,
> the natural relationship to all things. Its Yahweh was the
> expression of a consciousness of power, of joy in oneself, of hope
> for oneself: through him victory and welfare were expected ...
> Yahweh is the god of Israel and therefore the god of justice: the
> logic of every people that is in power and has a good conscience."
> (AC 25)
>
> And even today's degenerated, resentment-driven Jews, Nietzsche
> states, "are beyond any doubt the strongest, toughest and purest
> race now living in Europe." (BGE 251)
>
> Still, if the explanations offered by Augustine and Aquinas are
> considered the product of "slave morality", we can turn to Kevin
> MacDonald, the controversial American (non-Jewish) sociologist and
> scientist of Judaism, who considers the Israelite model of ethnic
> separatism and eugenics as crucial for conserving Western
> civilization:
>
> http://www.kevinmacdonald.net/WestSurvive.htm
>