Wasn't it you who, a few days ago, condescended to draw our attention
to the fact that "'Cruor' is by definition indemonstrable" and, not
content with this, spoke of "circular logic"? In fact, you are going
in circles, and, having sensed that your logic, which is not
necessary everyone's logic, nor, a fortiori, Logic with a capital L,
it's you who tries to evade the question by asking us to demonstrate
what cannot be demonstrated and what you know cannot be demonstrated
and what you ackowledged explicitly cannot be demonstrated, and, by
doing this, it's actually you who play with abstractions, all the
more as, unlike us, you never substantiate your personal views with
historical facts.
A mind possessed with the incubus of dialectics and the succubus of
logic may find truths such as "it is in the nature of fire to burn"
too simple. But that's the way it is, and there is nothing people can
do about it, whether people like it or not.
This forum was set up to discuss in a constructive manner the theory
of race put forward by Evola and which becomes more and more true as
years, as months, as days go by. If you think, or rather if you've
been led to think that that theory is mere 'fantasies', why on earth
do you waste your energy in making your point every two weeks or so
on this forum? Please let us know : we are deeply interested.
It's the third time that the following considerations are posted onto
this forum : "The reactions of this or that person towards the racist
idea are a sort of barometer which show us the 'quantity' of race
which is found in the person in question. The one who says yes to
racism is the one in whom race still lives : the one who has been
internally defeated by the anti-race and in whom the original forces
have been stifled by ethnic waste, by processes of cross-breeding and
degeneration, or by a bourgeois, weak, and intellectualistic style of
life which has lost for generations any contact with anything which
is really originary, opposes it and searches in all directions for
alibis in order to justify his aversion and discredit racism." They
shall be posted again each time we find it necessary, if you don't
mind.
Finally, this forum is especially designed for people who say yes to
racism, and not only intellectually. The rest is free to leave it.
--- In
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "Rowan Berkeley"
<rowan_berkeley@y...> wrote:
>
> But again like so many of Evola's clichés this one sounds good but
contains no actual data. It is the
> nature of fire to burn, of water to moisten, etcetera, so what?
Show us the factual difference between
> the jew and the aryan, instead of playing with abstractions. In my
view racial mysticism is a a dead end.
> It is doubtless the case that for whatever reasons (about which the
individual is free to form any
> fantasy he wishes) the jews have become the masters of global
speculative finance - so let's set our
> political sights against speculative finance, instead of chasing
racial moonbeams.
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Model Search 2005 - Find the next catwalk superstars -
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/hot/model-search/
>