WW I Revisionism

Expand Messages
  • G. van der Heide
    It would be interesting to list revisionist sources on the subject of the First World War. It seems that it s acceptable to publish about it. Supposedly. Since
    Message 1 of 3 , Aug 26, 2014
    • 0 Attachment
      It would be interesting to list revisionist sources on the subject of the First World War. It seems that it's acceptable to publish about it. Supposedly. 
      Since it's not likely that the "First World War Centenary" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_World_War_centenary), a propagandic feast, especially in the countries which got actively in the conflict, will allow refreshing views on this historical event to come to the fore.

      http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Erster_Weltkrieg#Literatur is a comprehensive list of sources.

      Other references about wartime propaganda:
      http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Vorgeschichte_des_Ersten_Weltkrieges
      http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Englands_Blutschuld_am_Weltkriege
      http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Kriegsschuldfrage_des_Ersten_Weltkrieges
      http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Raubstaat_England#Die_Einkreisung_Deutschlands
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill,_Hitler_and_the_Unnecessary_War#World_War_I
      http://codoh.com/library/document/363/#ftn18

      A recently published article in the mainstream press:
      http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/questions-of-culpability-in-wwi-still-divide-german-historians-a-953173.html
       
      On the interwoven subject of the six million figure and Zionism:
      http://sv.metapedia.org/wiki/6_000_000_judar
      http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=6451

    • G. van der Heide
      We just read about this English website which deals with the subject in connection with the official Oxford historiography.
      Message 2 of 3 , Sep 6, 2014
      • 0 Attachment
         
        We just read about this English website which deals with the subject in connection with the 'official' Oxford historiography.

         
        http://firstworldwarhiddenhistory.wordpress.com/
         
        http://firstworldwarhiddenhistory.wordpress.com/2014/08/15/the-conquest-of-oxford/
         

        From: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
        To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
        Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 13:41:27 +0200
        Subject: [evola_as_he_is] WW I Revisionism

         
        It would be interesting to list revisionist sources on the subject of the First World War. It seems that it's acceptable to publish about it. Supposedly. 
        Since it's not likely that the "First World War Centenary" (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_World_War_centenary), a propagandic feast, especially in the countries which got actively in the conflict, will allow refreshing views on this historical event to come to the fore.

        http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Erster_Weltkrieg#Literatur is a comprehensive list of sources.

        Other references about wartime propaganda:
        http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Vorgeschichte_des_Ersten_Weltkrieges
        http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Englands_Blutschuld_am_Weltkriege
        http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Kriegsschuldfrage_des_Ersten_Weltkrieges
        http://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Raubstaat_England#Die_Einkreisung_Deutschlands
        http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Churchill,_Hitler_and_the_Unnecessary_War#World_War_I
        http://codoh.com/library/document/363/#ftn18

        A recently published article in the mainstream press:
        http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/questions-of-culpability-in-wwi-still-divide-german-historians-a-953173.html
         
        On the interwoven subject of the six million figure and Zionism:
        http://sv.metapedia.org/wiki/6_000_000_judar
        http://forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=6451


      • timotheus.lutz
        It would be a very good thing if the First World War was better understood. Of course, the causes of the war were very complex and can only be fully
        Message 3 of 3 , Feb 7
        • 0 Attachment

          It would be a very good thing if the First World War was better understood.


          Of course, the causes of the war were very complex and can only be fully comprehended with a good knowledge of European history. J.F.C. Fuller, probably the best military historian of recent times, wrote an indispensable book called The Conduct of War, which considers the roots as well as the events of the major wars of modern times, starting with the French Revolution. His short Armament and History is an excellent supplement to this. For a concentrated and compact look at the war, Basil Liddell Hart's World War I in Outline can also be recommended.


          Incidentally, both authors were involved with the circle around Mosley, and in their books they do not pass over or ignore the excesses and stupidities of the Allies. Compared to the new mainstream histories, they are certainly revisionist.  


          Arthur Ponsonby's Falsehood in Wartime catalogues many of the preposterous lies spread by the Allies about the Germans.      

        Your message has been successfully submitted and would be delivered to recipients shortly.
        Add to this conversation...
        evola_as_he_is@{{emailDomain}}