The ongoing "obesification" process can be linked in a way to the ongoing
race-mixing process. The aim is identical: to irreversibly alter the body of the
European man, his last "stronghold", given that his soul and spirit have been
heavily altered by a variety of noxious processes. As shown by archeological
findings which depict non-European obese women being the object of a cult,
fatness seems to be particularly appreciated among the members of other races.
Today, it is known, and is well visible in North America, that Black people,
especially the women, are more prone to obesity than White people. Also, it
seems they are encouraged to be fat by Black men, who consider it as attractive,
as well as steatopygia. The phenomenon of large buttocks is still very common
throughout Africa – in Somalia for example. Thus, it would seem fatness is both
a "cultural" and biological trait peculiar to certain races. Liebenfels, despite
fanciful interpretations, had well identified this. Have a look there at the
various ancient representations showing grotesquely fat women:
http://www.american-buddha.com/cult.theozoology.htm
In relation to what Guénon said in the chapter "Solidification of the world",
what phenomenon could better illustrate the increasing "materiality" of man than
obesity?
--- In
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "Evola" wrote:
>
> We had never heard of such thing, nor had we seen any. We mean the `Hand of
Fatima'. Before clicking on the link you kindly provided, and seeing it for the
first time, we must say that what sprang to our mind upon reading about it was
Mohammed's daughter and a famous Portuguese town.
>
> Unsurprisingly, the web sites you borrowed the pictorial material from - that
is, those which try to alert their fellow citizens about the `Free-Masonic'
architecture of all major American buildings - do not see the ultimate
implications of the spreading of such signs and symbols in the current context
of our countries, let alone conspiracy theorists : to a large extent, the
later's stodgy, scattered, sensationalistic, pieces distract one from a much
bigger picture. Others, such as, for instance,
http://matricien.org/ study
matriarchy from a sympathetic, anti-patriarchal, eye. W. Bond, the author of the
text we quoted the other day in relation to Free-Masonic imaging, and who turns
out to be some sort of star in the Wicca `New Age' world
(
http://bardofely.hubpages.com/hub/Author-William-Bond-talks-about-matriachy-in-\
this-HubPage-interview), is a `matriarchist'.
>
> On a related point, there might be an unsuspected underlying reason why slow
poison is systematically prepared and sold as `food', `clothes', etc. on a large
scale nowadays. What we have in mind in this respect is only a hypothesis, which
we once took into Vandermok's confidence. It is quite bold, yet it is rigorously
in keeping with the last consideration made by J. Evola in a chapter of `Sintesi
di dottrina della razza' called `The mystery of birth – historical heredity and
transcendent heredity' (in French at
http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id97.html), which in turn stems from a
perspicacious reading of pre-Christian Aryan teachings on birth : "It is not
birth that determines people's nature, but conversely, it is people's nature –
in the broadest sense, since, again, common parlance is treacherous – which
determines birth." We may formulate this hypothesis later. Meanwhile, it may be
partly induced from the following pathological phenomenon : the increasing
prevalence of obesity in `Western' societies ; irrespective of the factors that
cause it, one cannot but wonder, given the `shape' of those who suffer from
obesity, whether the whole thing is connected with the clear intent to give life
to the "monstruous steatopygic [carved clay, stone, or bone] female idols of the
early megalithic period" (RATMM, p. 207), as representations of the "great
Asiatic-Southern Chthonic goddesses", in their most grotesque
'forms'.(
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Venus_von_Will\
endorf_01.jpg/185px-Venus_von_Willendorf_01.jpg)
>
>
> --- In
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "rouesolaire" wrote:
> >
> > "for example, among the Berbers, it is seen both as a vulviform symbol of
fertility and as a protecting eye."
> >
> > I guess this passage is referring, inter alia, to the hand of Fatima
(
http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/hand%20of%20fatima;
http://perlbal.hi-pi.com/blog-images/238919/gd/1233428225/La-main-de-Fatima.jpg)\
. This symbol can also be found in Kabbalistic ones and is named "Hamsa".
> >
http://www.kabbalah72.net/hamsa_hand_s/34.htm
> >
http://www.kabbalah72.net/Hamsa_Jewelry_s/76.htm
> >
http://www.squidoo.com/kabbalah-symbols
> >
http://www.myjewishlearning.com/beliefs/Issues/Magic_and_the_Supernatural/Practi\
ces_and_Beliefs/Amulets/Hamsa.shtml
> >
http://www.google.com/search?um=1&hl=fr&tbo=d&biw=1680&bih=890&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=r\
ed+string+evil+eye&btnG=
> >
http://www.google.com/search?hl=fr&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1680&bih=89\
0&q=kabbalah+red+string+evil+eye
> >
> > Another kabbalistic amulet which is not a Hamsa:
http://secretamulets.com/evil-eye-protection.html
> >
>