The development of female characteristics in a male because of hormonal disorder
marks the terminal stage of a process which started on the spiritual plane,
before being reflected on the mental plane, and, finally, on the social plane.
Feminisation has been studied both by sociology and biology ; owing to its
dogmatic evolutionist and materialist standpoint as well as, to start with, to
the `race of the soul' and the `race of the spirit' of most sociologists and
psychologists, sociology merely looks into the various aspects of social life
that changes toward an increasing focus on women, missing the essential point,
namely the increasing focus on feminine values ; needless to say current biology
is even less able to colligate its findings in this field with the mental and
spiritual phenomenon the many symptoms of physiological feminisation are only an
analogical repercussion of. What is more surprising is that none of the
twentieth century racialists and eugenicists – not even those who considered the
yellow race, the black race, and the Jews, as "feminine races" -, while
ascertaining and warning about the many dangers of interbreeding for the White
race, explored the cause and effect relationship between the crossbreeding of
members of the White race with members of other races and feminisation.
The findings and results of scientific studies on pathological feminisation are
increasingly alarming, except, naturally, for the "W.H.O.", and so are the
conditions it causes : we are seeing more and more males with low testosterone,
low libido, obesity, prostate cancer and enlarged prostate, male breast cancer,
testicular cancer, partial testicular feminisation, deformed and abnormally
smaller penises, gynecomastia, impotence, etc., all of which caused by chemical
estrogenic compounds, anti-androgen drugs, foods and drinks, as well as by
environmental pollutants found in the home, in clothes, in building materials,
and, in fact, just everywhere : virtually everything we eat, everything we
drink, every substance we are exposed to, has more or less direct feminising
effects on males - the chapter called `The Solidification of the World' in `The
Reign of Quantity' would benefit from being read from this perspective. These
studies unsurprisingly show that pathological feminisation is a process that
begins in the womb itself, and that the impact of anti-testosterone pesticides
on a male in the foetal stage is bound to alter his normal sexual inclination
and led him to exhibit effeminate behaviours and habits throughout life.
Even more alarming is the situation when looked at from a Dharmic standpoint.
Since birth is not a casual event, "birth does not determine nature, but… nature
determines birth" (`Revolt against the Modern World', p. 92), taking the Dharmic
law to its ultimate implications, it might be suggested as a working hypothesis
that the phenomenon known as "feminisation", far from being an abnormal,
pathological process detrimental to the full and organic development of the
nature of the kind of entities craving for being born again in this historical
samsaric cycle, is on the contrary an absolute precondition for their very
existence ; entities having acquired particularly strong feminine dispositions
in the prenatal and preconceptional states would need to incarnate in as
feminine bodies as possible and, in general, to find as feminine an environment
as possible, in order to be able to live and develop.