Hello,
Since you mention Dugin, let's point out to those who would still be
taken in by the monstrous ideological creature he's been put in
charge of promoting that he was a member of Parmyat - to quote
Klebnikov - "the anti-Semitic group that had emerged so visibly in
the late stages of the Gorbatchev regime. Pamyat would later be
revealed as a KGB-sponsored provocation, designed to channel Russian
nationalist sentiments into a politically reliable entity and to
frighten Western public opinion into supporting the moderate
Gorbatchev as the "only alternative" to extremist forces". As a
coincidence, Parmyat was an anti-Zionist group. We have just said "as
a coincidence", because we will never cease to agree with Julius
Evola in stating that Zionism and anti-Zionism are the two faces of
the same coin; they are false oppositions, meant to distract the
goyim's attention from the core of the Jewish problem, which is
neither Zionist or anti-Zionist, but refers to a racial element, as
shown and explained by Evola in 'Three Aspects of the Jewish Problem'.
That "Eurasianism" is a monstruous creature inspired by that Jew
as "creature of the Jewish law, and as conscious instrument of the
Jewish law" ('Presentation of the Jewish Problem') makes no doubt,
when one is clear-headed enough to see what's really behind the so-
called U.S.A and integrates this fact into his analysis of the
current situation. Aymeric Chauprade, a French author, doesn't, but
still manages to see what's behind "Eurasianism": since the beginning
of the 1990's, what has taken shape, after a long period of
preparation, is the transatlantic bloc. For those who are behind the
so-called U.S.A., this project is the vector of what is called
nowadays 'globalization'. For it to be fully achieved, China has to
be countered and neutralised. This is why those who are behind the so-
called U.S.A have been striving to build - to quote James baker - a
vast "Euro-Atlantic bloc, from Vancouver to Vladivostok, which aims
at integrating, besides the E.U., Russia, Turkey and Israel. To build
this anti-Chinese transatlantic block, the so-called U.S.A needs the
Eurasiatic Union to be extended to Turkey, Caucasus and central Asia.
The true guide of the E.U. widening is NATO. The countries of the
E.U. widening in 2004 are also the countries of the NATO widening
from 1999 to 2002. Caucasus and Central Asia are already in
the "Peace Partnership". The American presence in Central Asia since
the war in Afghanistan aims, among other things, at accelerating the
preparation of Central Asia to its joining NATO while placing US
troops near the borders of China. What's behind the so-called U.S.A.
wants to build the Eurasiatic Union, and not the European Union. This
Eurasiatic union will extend to the borders of China, with NATO as a
defence system and a transatlantic and transpacific Euro-Russo-
American partnership.
Thompkins&Cariou
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "Rowan Berkeley"
<rowan_berkeley@y...> wrote:
> hi, nice to see a copy of Le Bon in pdf.
>
> Tell me more about "Abu Jamal", your "Islam" (actually Shi'a)
> author. His statement that Sunni hadith do not talk of the Mahdi
> is incorrect, but more generally I wonder who he is. I notice he
> gives Gospel quotations in Hebrew, which is not the language in
> which they were originally written.
>
> Generally, I am tempted to imagine that like the Dugin followers
> he is pursuing the rather perverse idea that the Shi'a and for
> that matter the Israelis may eventually become champions of
> Eurasia against Oceania. In this geopolitique it is always taken
> for granted that Sunnis (apart from a few Sufis) are conscious
> or unconscious pawns on Oceania (by which obviously I mean
> anglo-America).
>
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> How much free photo storage do you get? Store your holiday
> snaps for FREE with Yahoo! Photos http://uk.photos.yahoo.com