I
can’t speak for Jews, they have their own destiny to work out.
But
doesn’t the same apply to so-called “Aryans”? Again in
Sintesi, Evola explains that race is not simply a biological category. It is
not sufficient to be born “white” to be an Aryan; a “second
birth” is also required, that is, a spiritual realisation of one’s
identity on a higher plane.
Men,
such as they are, will mate with anyone, including each other. In the United
States a few months back, a man was even arrested for having intercourse with a
dead deer by the side of the road.
That
is why some effort at detachment from the immediacy of life is absolutely
necessary in order to understand anything at all. Even if one manages to gain
some understanding on the physical plane, without sufficient spiritual effort,
nothing positive can ever come from it.
From:
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com [mailto:evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of G Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2007 5:55 PM To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com Subject: [SPAM][evola_as_he_is] Re: Jews and Japanese
How would one explain the fact that some Jews
wish to remain racially
"pure", not wanting to have a relationship/marriage with non-Jews,
and
some having no problem having a relationship/marriage with non-Jews?
Is this a matter of betting on a different horse, so to speak?
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com,
"Toni Ciopa" <hyperborean@...>
wrote:
>
> RE: "J. Evola never called himself a traditionalist."
>
>
>
> This may very well be true since "traditionalism" represents no
body of
> knowledge, nor school of thought, nor creed to believe; hence it
makes no
> sense to call oneself a "traditionalist."
>
>
>
> However, the word is one thing and reality another. In "Sintesi di
dottrina
> della razza", Evola writes:
>
>
>
> "the precise, strict, objective knowledge of the spirit of the
primordial
> traditions must be the decisive factor" (that is, in the discussion
of
> race).
>
>
>
> It is worth quoting the section in full:
>
>
>
> "It is necessary to stay attentive and not fall into the
misunderstandings
> and errors that we mentioned [i.e., about neopaganism], which
basically only
> play into the hands of common enemies. In such an eventuality, a man
must
> put himself on a level where doctrinal confusion is not allowed in,
where
> every dilettantism and every arbitrary intellectual exercise is
excluded,
> where every subjection to confused, passionate impulses and polemical
> animosities must be forcibly fought off, where, finally and above
all, only
> the precise, strict, objective knowledge of the spirit of the primordial
> traditions must be the decisive factor." (p 137-138)
>
>
>
> Unfortunately, Revilo P. Oliver is a neopagan and not at that level.
Caveat
> emptor.
>
>
In the book 'Histoire Inconnue des Juifs et des Japonais pendant la seconde guerre mondiale' (Unknown history of the Jews and of the Japanese during the WW2,...
Good point. However, in 'The Fugu Plan - The untold story of the Japanese and the Jews during World War II', M. Takayer and M. Swartz explain that it is not...
Though the late Professor Revilo P. Oliver's biological racialist worldview and lack of transcendence put his work at a great distance from Traditionalism, the...
No matter how low a biological racial world-view is, it is still incomparable higher than a non racial or anti-racial cathotheist dissertation, whether...
RE: (from 19 May) In 'Avvento del "Quinto Stato"' ('Fenomenologia della sovversione'), Evola wonders whether this involutive process stops at the 'fourth ...
Indeed. 'Avvento del "Quinto Stato"' was published in the 1960's, and, by then, Tantrism and Avalon no longer seemed to be of any interest to Evola, any more...
RE: "J. Evola never called himself a traditionalist." This may very well be true since "traditionalism" represents no body of knowledge, nor school of thought,...
How would one explain the fact that some Jews wish to remain racially "pure", not wanting to have a relationship/marriage with non-Jews, and some having no...
I can't speak for Jews, they have their own destiny to work out. But doesn't the same apply to so-called "Aryans"? Again in Sintesi, Evola explains that race...
It is sufficient to be born a Jew to be a Jew ; no 'second birth' is required in this case. It is essential to understand what is meant exactly by 'dvija' ...
... Can you elaborate on this point? What about Anglos that adopted Judiasm or Jews that reject Judiasm? I'm curious about the Evolian view on this matter....
You look at things from a religious angle. As far as we are concerned, it is from a racial point of view that we look at them. From that point of view, the...
More on the Prince of Wales' relation to Traditionalism: http://traditionalistblog.blogspot.com/2006/10/traditionalists-by-appointment-to-hrh.html He even...
... To what extent, then, can we call Aryan a Europe that was Christian for nearly two millennia? Would we be able to draw from that that every European who,...
Are you sure that you don't want to re-read what you have written, to think about it again, to ponder over it, before, summing up in part what we have been...
To what extent? To the extent - and this has been stated in black and white each time this issue has been raised on this list - in which J. Evola called modern...
There was no racial consciousness in the Middle Ages, and they could not be any, for the reasons we have mentioned in our previous message. Your second...
I don't understand your point. Evola describes "dvija" in its Hindu context just as you say (Sintesi IV.1). The first three castes correspond to the tripartite...
Re: "No matter how low a biological racial world-view is, it is still incomparable higher than a non racial or anti-racial cathotheist dissertation, whether...