Your question is basically impossible to answer.
The closest thing to understanding the intellectual strains of Evola's major works would be to read "The Path of Cinnabar."
Everything else is amateur deconstructionism.
From: R.P. <brightimperator@...>
To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sunday, April 8, 2012 10:43 PM
Subject: [evola_as_he_is] Re: Evolian Meta-Philosophy
I am not a Heidegger guy--except where Heidegger resonates with medieval theology. Anyway--"neo-Idealism" is just a term--is "post-Kantian Idealism" less unsuitable? Words, semantics... But Evola, in spite of his Eastern and medieval spiritual education , I believe is following the specific Germanic transcendentalist Idealism somewhere near SCHELLING, and squeezing it strongly for the last drop of insight...
Vico...Schelling..."trans-rationalistic rationalism" of the Eliadian phenomenologist of Numinous experience...theosophically-filtered, esoteric-Hyperborean "neo-Theosophia"...? Evola outdid Fichtean subjectivist solipsism in his "magical Idealism" already, deepening matters...so...where exactly does he belong, analytically...?
Heck, at least I didn't call Evola a "neo-Stirnerian, neo-Sorelian Nietzschean pathological case" like some academic idiots...
I lament Heidegger's failure to uphold transcendent, arch-principial reality against the ravages of Judaic demoplutocratic intellectual demolition, neo-Gramscian contagion of sub-humanism, and techno-capitalist, materialist Nihilism. The de-souled mechanization of life only needed to be answered by aggressive counter-assertion of qualitative spiritual imagination. Heidegger is a tangled bog--regressive elements vying with superior elements...Nietzschean romanticism interwoven with Eckhartian apophatic negativistic theology of the Middle Ages...
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, Asdfasdsfdas Sfsdf <andreforcordelia@...> wrote:
>
> What is "neo-idealism?"
>
> Do you meantranscendental Idealism like Kant and Fichte?
>
> Let me guess, you are a Heidegger-guy?
>
>
> That would be the only way this pointed question could be understood in a way that it could be responded to.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: R.P. <brightimperator@...>
> To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 8, 2012 10:01 AM
> Subject: [evola_as_he_is] Evolian Meta-Philosophy
>
>
> Â
> Evola derives Tradition from pure integral metaphysical Being itself; yet humanly, the locus of Evola in mundane philosophic history is best characterized how...? Evola continues continental neo-Idealism almost to the point of outpacing it...and then his "static gnosis of platonic being" seems to suggest his neo-Plotinian main impetus...
>
> How would the erudite moderator describe the place of Evola in terms of the philosophy of existence and Western thinking...? Thx for your time.
>
Vico...Schelling..."trans-rationalistic rationalism" of the Eliadian phenomenologist of Numinous experience...theosophically-filtered, esoteric-Hyperborean "neo-Theosophia"...? Evola outdid Fichtean subjectivist solipsism in his "magical Idealism" already, deepening matters...so...where exactly does he belong, analytically...?
Heck, at least I didn't call Evola a "neo-Stirnerian, neo-Sorelian Nietzschean pathological case" like some academic idiots...
I lament Heidegger's failure to uphold transcendent, arch-principial reality against the ravages of Judaic demoplutocratic intellectual demolition, neo-Gramscian contagion of sub-humanism, and techno-capitalist, materialist Nihilism. The de-souled mechanization of life only needed to be answered by aggressive counter-assertion of qualitative spiritual imagination. Heidegger is a tangled bog--regressive elements vying with superior elements...Nietzschean romanticism interwoven with Eckhartian apophatic negativistic theology of the Middle Ages...
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, Asdfasdsfdas Sfsdf <andreforcordelia@...> wrote:
>
> What is "neo-idealism?"
>
> Do you meantranscendental Idealism like Kant and Fichte?
>
> Let me guess, you are a Heidegger-guy?
>
>
> That would be the only way this pointed question could be understood in a way that it could be responded to.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: R.P. <brightimperator@...>
> To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 8, 2012 10:01 AM
> Subject: [evola_as_he_is] Evolian Meta-Philosophy
>
>
> Â
> Evola derives Tradition from pure integral metaphysical Being itself; yet humanly, the locus of Evola in mundane philosophic history is best characterized how...? Evola continues continental neo-Idealism almost to the point of outpacing it...and then his "static gnosis of platonic being" seems to suggest his neo-Plotinian main impetus...
>
> How would the erudite moderator describe the place of Evola in terms of the philosophy of existence and Western thinking...? Thx for your time.
>