Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

rouesolaire · rouesolaire@yahoo.fr | Group Member  - Edit Membership Start a Group | My Groups
evola_as_he_is · EVOLA AS HE IS

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 121
  • Category: Spirituality
  • Founded: Nov 19, 2004
  • Language: English

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Archeofuturism   Topic List   < Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Reply  | 
Re: [evola_as_he_is] Archeofuturism

Oh! If only that gifted group of musicians, hailing from Genova, who'd lately proclaimed to be 'archeofuturist', were to read this.

2010/10/17 Evola <evola_as_he_is@...>
 

The more chaos grows in the South, the higher the number of Africans and of Asians desperate to emigrate and to settle down in Europe, the more chaos grows in the North.

The application of the refugee status keeps being extended, as the pressure keeps growing : environmental migrant's, the latest added to the list, may "lack an agreed definition", those who produced it do not lack imagination, and they can be fully trusted to apply it just as imaginatively. It is often pointed out that it's only fair, or logical, that, having been colonised by us, they now colonise us, now that decolonisation has finished. All in all, we would be hoisted by our own petard. In actual facts, and bearing in mind that modern colonisation was not exactly our own petard (http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id34.html), and decolonisation even less so, it can be argued that the effects of colonisation on Southern countries, especially that which was based on colonialism, were not all harmful, whereas mass resettlement of Southern populations in Europe is pure parasitism.

The view that "The transplant of the Western socio-economic model into Southern countries turned out to be explosive", since, instead of returning to their traditional social and economic activities, they followed in the West's footsteps, is a cliché which is rather widespread in traditionalist and humanitarian circles, and in current right-wing circles, too, and which does not withstand the historical analysis. Not only it should be emphasised that "The transplant of the Western socio-economic model into Southern countries turned out to be explosive" as soon as decolonisation started, while it worked quite well during colonisation, but, more importantly, it should be wondered why those countries reportedly did not return to their so-called traditions, once they were freed from the yoke of the West by the... West. The reason they did not return to their traditions is that, during colonisation, they had never abandoned them.

Merchant capitalism developed in China, in the Indian subcontinent, and in Africa, at the same time or, in some areas, even before it developed in Europe. Given that "Those Europeans who first came into direct contact with India in the latter part of the 18th century, when the British began their conquest of the subcontinent, found a region much of which was undergoing a deep economic and political crisis" ;

that "With the establishment of the Mogul empire in the 16th century, there was 'the growth of commerce and the extensive activation for the market... The rapid spread of the tobacco crop within the first 50 years of the 17th century throughout the length and breadth of India is an index of how quickly the peasant was now able to follow the market'.
There was development of the means of production, with the adoption of many of the same innovations that took root in medieval and early modern Europe. Irfan Habib has pointed out that the Indian subcontinent had developed to the same general level in making elementary machines as western Europe by the 17th century. The building of the Taj Mahal in the mid-17th century utilised the skills and techniques of craftsmen from right across Eurasia, while the Indian textile industry used looms and spinning wheels essentially the same as those used in 16th and early 17th century Europe. Overall, there was a massive growth of markets, of trade, of craft production (it is worth remembering that in the 18th century India sold much more to Europe than vice versa) and of urbanisation.
The direction of economic and social development in India was not fundamentally different to that in Europe. This was because of considerable similarities in both the relations of exploitation and the productive forces. The direction in which Indian and west European economic development was heading was the same. There were considerable differences in speed of development. But these difference existed on just as great a scale between different regions within both Europe and India." ;

that, "by the twelve century, Merchant classes arose that were able to influence society politically by making alliances with monarchs against the big landed aristocrats, in much the same way as in the absolute monarchies that arose at the end of the west European feudal period. Sometimes these merchants moved over from involvement in trade alone to involvement in the production of things like iron, salt and luxury goods. And by the end of the first millennium the owners of large estates began to see advantages in relying on tenant farmers or wage labourers to work them--again, a development similar to that which took place in the late European Middle Ages. The economic and political changes were matched in both periods by ideological ferment, with new sets of ideas challenging the Confucian worldview of the landed gentry class.
By the 12th century this society had most of the productive techniques which were to be associated with the rise of capitalism in Western Europe 500 years later. There was widespread use of 'free' labour. And there was a merchant class capable of exerting influence on the state. Yet capitalism did not break through." (http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/isj102/harman.htm) - given all this, it is, to say the least, extremely fanciful to state condescendingly that "The differences between East and West seem to have been continually on the increase, but this divergence can be said to have been one-sided in the sense that it is only the West which has changed, whereas the East, broadly speaking, has remained much the same as it was in times that we are accustomed to call ancient, but that nevertheless are comparatively recent". ('Introduction to the Study of the Hindu Doctrines', R. Guénon)

The next message on 'Archeofurism' will go deeper into the determining contributions of ancient, traditional, China to the current financial crisis.



--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "Evola" <evola_as_he_is@...> wrote:
>
> After having outlined the views upheld in 'Archeofuturism' on the crisis of modern Europe, let us now discuss them critically.
>
> Today, very few people in Europe, except those who are in charge of planning it, those who are busy organising it, and those who are even busier implementing it - in short, except those who, from the top to the bottom of the current economic, social and political pseudo-hierarchy, benefit from it one way or the other - are still trying to deny the increasingly visible fact that the immigration of settlement has been increasing exponentially for 40 years or so in Western European countries. Many more, be it out of compassion, out of humanity, or simply because they are bastardised, claim that, far from representing a threat for the biological survival of native European peoples, extra-European mass immigration to Europe is an "opportunity". The author is certainly not one of these. The category to which he belongs in this respect is that of those who ascertain the issues arising from mass immigration of extra-Europeans to Western Europe without going back to its actual root, when they are not simply trying to duck or to hide it, either behind second causes, or behind a veil of consequences. At best, "the collapse of Churches in Europe" in the second half of the twentieth century could be treated - as a working hypothesis - as one of the various catalysts of the "highly volatile situations" with which "the ever-increasing colonisation of settlement of the Northern hemisphere by Southern peoples" is fraught, if and only if the Orthodox church, the Catholic church, and Protestantism once proved, both in principle and in practice, to go against phenomena such as extra-European mass immigration to Europe. Admittedly, they do not oppose such phenomena ; not only they do not oppose them, but they desperately promote and even foster them, both ideologically and 'on the ground'. Ideologically speaking, as rightly noted by A. Rosenberg, both the Church and Freemasonry gather their supporters in the name of love or of humanity, in the name of internationalism : "There is no Jew or Greek, servant or free, male or female : because you are all one in Jesus Christ" (Galatians 3:28) has always been, and is more than ever, a cornerstone of the Church's dogma and praxis : never has the Church been in a better position to make its dream of "universal love", which was once dreamt by its age-old forerunners, come true as it is now, as no higher antithetical force seems to be able to counter and to check it on the political plane, and, as a result, its leaders - the pope and Co. - whose political power is still substantial, and whose influence is still strong, have a free hand. Christianity may have collapsed as a faith, just as Communism did as a form of government, the fact still remains that Christianity as a worldview is stronger than ever : Christian values such as "God's special love for aliens" have permeated the psyche of the modern native European man, to the point of possessing it and of making him forget the superior interests of his kinfolk.
>
> Low birth rates among white Europeans will, and, for that matter, already have an economic and financial impact on European countries. The story goes that the time is near when the contributions on wages and salaries paid jointly by employees and employers will not suffice to pay the pensions of retired people. According to the author, two dogmas of "the egalitarian ideology of(old) modernity have prevented us from remedying this situation : first, anti-natalism (….) ; then, the egalitarian refusal to switch from a general social security scheme to a pension funds system". Arguably, the anti-natalist policies pursued by the representatives of the forces of occupation in Europe since 1945 have been fully successful, since the total fertility rate is not high enough to replace this area's population. As to the Anglo-Saxon pension funds system he advocates, or rather he advocated at the time he wrote 'Archeofuturism', ten years before pension funds were hit hard by the 2008 financial crisis, it is a direct offshoot, entirely based on a ponzi scheme, of the liberalism, of the speculative capitalism, he claims to fight. The story goes, we have just recalled, that, as the number of retirees rises in proportion to the number of workers, it logically ensues that the latter's contributions to pensions will end up not being enough to cover the former's pensions ; the story is believed universally, including by the author ; the story is inaccurate. In reality, the population of Western European countries keeps rising, and so does, proportionally, the working population ; more precisely, the number of extra-Europeans keeps rising, while the number of Europeans keeps dropping, and, conversely, the extra-European working population keeps rising, while the European working population keeps dropping. So what's the matter ? The matter is that working population refers to the number of people who are willing and eligible to work, and not to the number of people actually employed ; it includes job seekers, who live on State benefits (unemployment, which is more than ever on the rise, cannot possibly be stamped out in the current state of affairs). And so do a large number of extra-European immigrants. It ensues from this, and, this time, logically, that the rise of extra-European immigration to Europe means, more or less proportionally, the rise of unemployment in Europe as well as an exponential increase of the funds destined to social security by the impostors who currently run European countries ; they are being raised and embezzled more and more aggressively, at the native European taxpayer's expense, to subsidise the program of colonisation of Europe by extra-European populations and the genocide of European natives. By the end of this century, or even before, extra-European populations in Europe will be a majority, among which a large number, even larger than now, will still be living on State benefits, pensions will no longer exist, except for those who will have been able to afford investing some of their money into a fund pension throughout their working life, provided that that fund pension, due to an umpteenth 'financial' crisis, does not vanish in thin air unexpectedly by the time they retire. The author would object, or rather prophesise, that what's left of society is bound to implode before that point of no return is reached. As far as we are concerned, we would object to his prophecies that civilisations do eventually die, after falling into a coma that can last ages. The ongoing economic and demographic crisis can make the society we live in implode, if the impostors who run it, and, more importantly, those who are behind the scenes, do not know what they are doing and they are, so to speak, in a visual flight situation : if, on the other hand, they know exactly what they doing, post-modernity could outlive itself.
>
> The author's further arguments in favour of the thesis of the collapse of will be examined later.
>
>
> --- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "Evola" <evola_as_he_is@> wrote:
> >
> > Assuming that the readers have read the "product description" at http://www.arktos.com/guillaume-faye-archeofuturism.html/ let us go through the sixth main factors which the author sees combining to bring about "the series of catastrophes" he "prophesises". The first factor is the "cancerisation of the European social fabric", owing to "the ever-increasing colonisation of settlement of the Northern hemisphere by Southern peoples", which is "fraught with highly volatile situations caused mainly by the collapse of Churches in Europe, which has become a land of conquest for Islam". These factors of social disintegration (and not of "social break-up", as this phenomenon is clumsily called by the author) will be aggravated by a demographic and economic crisis that will only deteriorate". The third factor is termed the "Southern chaos" : "By becoming industrialised, Southern countries, despite (despite?) their deceptive and fragile economic growth, have created an ever-increasing social chaos." The fourth factor is "the threat of a worldwide financial crisis", which would be far worse than the Great Depression in the 1930's "and would lead to a global recession". The rise of religious fundamentalisms, essentially Islam, is presented as the fifth factor, and "the uncontrolled increase of global pollution", in that it represents "a threat to the physical survival of humanity", as the sixth.
> > The first thing to make clear is that there is nothing 'prophetic' or even new about these views, about this phenomenological diagnosis of the crisis of the European world, which, leaving aside, perhaps, the ecological issue, was already made, back in the 1970's and even sooner, by the few true representatives of the Right left at that time, and, to some extent, even acknowledged by the petit-bourgeois clique of the institutionalised French so-called far-right party, the "Front National", which, in 1998, Faye, with a typical unintentional sense of humour, called "revolutionary", and which, in a few months, could be run by a female, the daughter's current owner. Needless to say, the fact that Faye's views on the crisis of the European world are not 'new' does not bother us in any way. Far from it. All we are interested in is to find out whether or not they are consistent with a true right-wing Weltanschauung, along Evolian lines, or, better, along the lines of the spirit J. Evola was essentially a bearer of. This will be the object of our next post on 'Archeofuturism'. Meanwhile, all those who have read the book in question and have cared to read the various messages we have posted onto this list on Eurasianism and National-Bolshevism, on the collusion between the heads of so-called Muslim Fundamentalism and the CIA body, should be able to figure out - more or less - its content.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "JC" <gothari@> wrote:
> > >
> > > And why would it be throwing money out the window? I assume you are thinking about 'The New Jewish Question' which is Faye's latests book, which has received much criticism from various parties. This however was his first book, and it has been pivotal in the formation and understanding of the concept 'Archeofuturism' which is now a household word in most New Right circles.
> > >
> > > J.
> > >
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Evola
> > > To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
> > > Sent: Monday, October 11, 2010 7:44 PM
> > > Subject: [evola_as_he_is] Re: Archeofuturism
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Contrary to what is stated on http://www.arktos.com/guillaume-faye-archeofuturism.html/ that book is not a must-read. Far from it. More about Faye's views later on. For now, all we would like to do is to prevent the people of this group from throwing 17 Euros out of the window.
> > >
> > > --- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "dkhf_svendborg" <gothari@> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I thought this might be of interest to the people of this group.
> > > >
> > > > Arktos (www.arktos.com) has recently published Guillaume Faye's "Archeofuturism: European Visions of the Post-Catastrophic Age". In Archeofuturism, Faye prophesises a series of catastrophes between 2010 and 2020, brought about by the unsustainability of the present world order, which he asserts will offer an opportunity to rebuild the West. Please see below for further details:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.arktos.com/guillaume-faye-archeofuturism.html
> > > >
> > > > Also still available: "A Handbook of Traditional Living", "Tradition & Revolution" by Troy Southgate, Evola's "Path of Cinnabar", radical ecologist Pentti Linkola's "Can Life Prevail?", and an attractive music and clothes section. Please have a look: www.arktos.com.
> > > >
> > > > For more Arktos news please have a look at our newsletter:
> > > >
> > > > http://www.arktos.com/newsletter/arktos2.html
> > > >
> > >
> >
>




Sun Oct 17, 2010 8:11 pm

vnvsmvndvs
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 | 
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hello, I thought this might be of interest to the people of this group. Arktos (www.arktos.com) has recently published Guillaume Faye's "Archeofuturism:...
dkhf_svendborg Offline Send Email Oct 11, 2010
7:06 pm

Contrary to what is stated on http://www.arktos.com/guillaume-faye-archeofuturism.html/ that book is not a must-read. Far from it. More about Faye's views...
Evola
evola_as_he_is Offline Send Email
Oct 11, 2010
8:02 pm

And why would it be throwing money out the window? I assume you are thinking about 'The New Jewish Question' which is Faye's latests book, which has received...
JC
dkhf_svendborg Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2010
5:26 pm

Assuming that the readers have read the "product description" at http://www.arktos.com/guillaume-faye-archeofuturism.html/ let us go through the sixth main...
Evola
evola_as_he_is Offline Send Email
Oct 12, 2010
9:45 pm

After having outlined the views upheld in 'Archeofuturism' on the crisis of modern Europe, let us now discuss them critically. Today, very few people in...
Evola
evola_as_he_is Offline Send Email
Oct 16, 2010
2:14 pm

The more chaos grows in the South, the higher the number of Africans and of Asians desperate to emigrate and to settle down in Europe, the more chaos grows in...
Evola
evola_as_he_is Offline Send Email
Oct 17, 2010
3:08 pm

Oh! If only that gifted group of musicians, hailing from Genova, who'd lately proclaimed to be 'archeofuturist', were to read this. 2010/10/17 Evola...
G. van der Heide
vnvsmvndvs Offline Send Email
Oct 18, 2010
8:08 pm

"In essence, the economist M. Allais rightly noted, the present creation of money, out of nothing by the banking system, is similar - I do not hesitate to say...
Evola
evola_as_he_is Offline Send Email
Oct 20, 2010
5:57 pm

So, according to the author, religious fundamentalism, especially Muslim fundamentalism, is the fifth factor likely to cause the implosion of the current...
Evola
evola_as_he_is Offline Send Email
Oct 26, 2010
6:05 pm

Copyright © 2012 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Guidelines NEW - Help