I thank you. It is true that using this "Z" word lends itself to
obscuration. I should have been more succinct and said "Judaic."
An "Atlantic Alliance" was only part of their programme to rush in
their particular form of disintegration. These so-called "post war"
years can make whatever was noble, appear tragic, in retrospect. Now
that the forces of dissolution have practically risen to the top,
certain questions seem secondary, as their onslaught worsens.
--- In
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "evola_as_he_is"
<evola_as_he_is@...> wrote:
>
>
> First of all, as we have repeatedly stated and as we will repeat
until
> it gets into everyone's head on this forum, Evola, as it emerges
from
> various of his texts on the Jewish problem, was neither Zionist or
> anti-Zionist, since, to him as to anyone who looks at this question
> from a higher point of view, the creation of the State of Israel
was
> an umpteenth trick of International Jewry, which, by the way, is
> neither Zionist nor anti-Zionist either, but for diametrically
> opposite reasons.
>
> Then, to the best of our knowledge, Evola never referred to P2
> (interesting enough, spelled in French, this is the name of a
Pope),
> which, by the way, headlined only in the early 1980's.
>
> Finally, the action of 'Olympian' forces, per se, is not desperate
in
> any way.
>
>
>
> --- In
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "darkiexx" <tristanarpe@>
wrote:
> >
> >
> > Did Evola spiritually alert his acolytes to Zionist compromised
> > GLADIO /P2 or did he see it as probably another manifestation of
what
> > was left of any "Olympian" forces struggling in there last
desperate
> > stance against dissolution?
> >
>