The complete list of articles published by Evola in German papers is
found - it has just come back to us now - in 'Julius Evola nei
documenti segreti dell'Ahnenerbe' (Quaderni di testi evoliani n. 30,
Fondazione Julius Evola, 1997). The article in question is called
'Geistige Voraussetzungen einer Europäischen Einheit'. We have not had
the opportunity to consult it, but, given its title, it might be a
'rough draught' of http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id54.html/ It
was published in 'Pan-Europa' in 1932 and Coudenhove-Kalergi does not
seem to have been particularly enthusiastic about it : no other
article by Evola was ever published again in this paper.
As for Evola, he is most unlikely to have read that excerpt of
Coudenhove-Kalergi's - a mongrel himself - prophetic 'Praktischer
idealismus' (1925) : "The future man will be a mongrel. As for a Pan
Europe, I wish to see there a Eurasian-Negroid mixture with great
variation in personality types (...) The Jews shall take the leading
positions, since good providence has given Europe a spiritually
superior race of nobility called the Jews." For further information on
the EU, see the Austrian political scientist Karl Steinhauser's 'EG -
die Super-UdSSR von morgen' (Vienna, 1992) - "The European Union - the
Super Soviet Union (USSR) of Tomorrow'.
Speaking of so-called 'Eurasianism', it has been a while since we have
undertaken to unmask this movement which, from a European standpoint,
can only be regarded as an ideological anti-European scam set up by
the Jew. We certainly do not intend to stop halfway. Additional
information to
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/evola_as_he_is/message/207/, in which
the role of the Chechen mafia and its traditionalist elements is
discussed, will be posted soon.
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "G" <vnvsmvndvs@...> wrote:
>
> There is a passage in H. T. Hansen's article "Julius Evola und die
> deutsche konservative Revolution" [Criticón 158 (April/Mai/June 1998)
> pp. 16-32] that would interest some of us here to a certain extent...
> Yes, `to a certain extent', as Hansen claims in it that Evola
> contributed to Coudenhove-Kalergi's publication Pan-Europa, while not
> substantiating this claim.
>
> In the article in question the author speaks at a certain point about
> Evola publishing in Prinz Karl Anton von Rohan's "Europäische Revue".
> What follows then is a paragraph called VON ROHAN'S IDEA'S ABOUT
> EUROPE where is being explained that Von Rohan's views on a European
> order differ very much from those of Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Pan-
> Europa Movement. Added is then that <start quote>Evola clearly stood
> much closer to the principles of von Rohan, which didn't prevent him
> to publish also in the editorial of von Coudenhove-
> Kalergi, "Paneuropa".<end quote> (roughly translated from the Dutch
> translation of the article).
>
> Since the group owner has shed the necessary light on Coudenhove-
> Kalergi and the weltanschauung he actually represents, it would be
> good to have this issue clarified.
> As it now stands the claim appears to be dubious in nature, as it
> lacks a further explanation and has no note attached to it (while
> throughout the article there are a lot of notes!).
>
> If there is indeed truth to it, than we must also ask the question
> how well informed Evola was about the editorial and it's contents.
>
> --- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "evola_as_he_is"
> <evola_as_he_is@> wrote:
> >
> > Let's get this straight : there are professions which should be
> > forbidden to women, and which, as a matter of fact, were forbidden
> to
> > women, in their own interest and, beyond this, in the interest of
> the
> > whole community of white racial skin, on the basis of their nature,
> in
> > traditional societies of Aryan origin. "Citizen assemblies, the
> > senate, a set of largely annual magistracies, and the courts of law
> > which regulated these constituted the government of the Roman
> > republic. All these jobs and activities were forbidden to women.
> Women
> > did not vote, did not hold public office, did not speak in
> assemblies
> > and did not serve as judges or jurors. Situations in which women did
> > enter this sphere were taken as outrageous exceptions and used to
> > reinforce the traditional boundaries." "(...) Provincial governance,
> > international relations, and the military were also strictly male
> > domains." Still in 'Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the
> Roman
> > empire', B. Severy tells us how "Livy explores the decay of Roman
> > society which led to the disaster of his own day in part through a
> > presentation of a debate on the repeal of the lex Oppea [a Roman law
> > created in 215 BCE and canceled in 195 BCE, limiting how much gold
> > women could have, forbidding women from wearing dresses of too many
> > colors and driving in a horse-drawn vehicle too close to the City
> > unless for a religious rite]. The possibility of eliminating this
> > sumptuary restriction of the Second Punic War on women's display and
> > ownership of jewelry brought crowds of Roman women into the forum.
> > the speech Livy gives to the law's advocate, Cato the Elder, depicts
> > the impropriety of these women and the failure of their men to
> control
> > them as threats to the state :
> >
> > "If each of us, citizens, had been resolved to assert a husband's
> > rights and authority in relation to his own wife, we should have
> > less trouble with women altogether ; now our liberty, having been
> > conquered at home, is also trampled on and crushed here in the forum
> > due to a feminine lack of self control, and because we were unable
> to
> > hold individual women in check, we tremble before them as a group...
> > [They want] you to abrogate the law which you have enacted by your
> > votes, which you have tested by use for so many years and by
> > experience, that is, [they want] that by lifting one law you should
> > weaken the others." (see, for excerpts :
> > http://books.google.com/books?
> id=SBRN6HW8xEIC&pg=PA25&lpg=PA25&dq=reich+%22forbi\
> > dden+to+women%
> 22&source=web&ots=EuWZobGzNx&sig=LOdrQzbZA_SbLBte6IBWD67s_lA#PPA41\
> > ,M1
> >
> > The Imperium Evola called for is based on the same world-view, a
> > world-view which is derived from principles antithetic to the
> > pseudo-principles currently applied by those who, behind the scenes,
> > pull the strings of the EU and of similar mafia-like organisations.
> On
> > the difference between the Imperium and modern imperialism, see
> > http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id34.html and
> > http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id54.html
> >
> > What is 'Le Cercle information'?
> >
> >
> >
> > --- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, andy@ wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, evola_as_he_is wrote:
> > >
> > > > Beyond the most anecdotal character of this sex crime, one has
> to
> > > > remain focused, and, in this respect, to remain focused means
> to bear
> > > > in mind that, as rightly pointed out in 'Revolt against the
> Modern
> > > > World', everything nowadays is basically stomach-centred. Hence
> the
> > > > increasing tyranny of economy and the aggravation of 'intestine
> > > > conflicts'. It is not by chance that, for example, the system
> created
> > > > in 1972 to maintain a fluctuation margin between the EU
> countries'
> > > > currencies was named 'monetary snake'.
> > > >
> > > > To remain focused also means to bear in mind that any sex crime
> is
> > > > advertised on mass media as a screen smoke, as a means of
> distracting
> > > > Westerners' attention from the real issues, all the more easily
> as
> > > > most current Westerners either do not want to see the real
> issues or
> > > > cannot see them. Sex crime turns out to be the most effective
> way of
> > > > distracting their attention from the real issues. Every now and
> then,
> > > > especially in Anglo-Saxon countries, a political schemer is
> involved
> > > > in a sex scandal, and, as a result, he may even be asked to
> resign
> > > > from office. This shows just how low things have gotten in the
> West.
> > > > In a Western society worth of the name, these political
> schemers would
> > > > certainly be tried, but they would not be so for sex crimes. As
> far as
> > > > Whites are concerned, they would be tried, as well as their
> family,
> > > > for high treason.
> > > >
> > > > Incidentally, http://www.pehi.eu reveals itself in its true
> colours
> > > > when labeling an individual who once stated... "The future man
> will be
> > > > a mongrel. As for a Pan Europe, I wish to see there a Eurasian-
> Negroid
> > > > mixture with great variation in personality types (....) The
> Jews
> > > > shall take the leading positions, since good providence has
> given
> > > > Europe a spiritually superior race of nobility called the Jews."
> > > > ('Praktischer idealismus', 1925)... a Fascist
> > > > (http://www.pehi.eu/archives_2006.htm). Besides, one cannot but
> note
> > > > that, in the whole 'indictment', there is no mention of any
> females :
> > > > considering that the EU staff, as any other parasitic
> institution's in
> > > > the West, is increasingly feminine, and that the intrinsic
> corruption
> > > > of those mafia-like institutions is directly proportional to the
> > > > number of females in their staff, this 'omission' is rather
> > > > mouth-watering.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Indeed, most people do not realize or do not consider it
> important that
> > > organizations such as the CIA and Pentagon are staffed with a
> slight
> > > majority of female employees.
> > >
> > > However, I'm new to the Le Cercle information, but as someone
> that has
> > > been following the CFR and all the usual suspects over the years I
> > fail to
> > > see what is surprising about their activities? Also, considering
> the
> > > anti-communist agenda that their members played during the Cold
> War
> > era,
> > > what makes them insidious today, thay they are the hidden movers
> of the
> > > multicultural agenda of pan Europa? Even Evola called for an
> imperium
> > > Europa. Yes the EU is certainly a degenerate concoction, but is
> it
> > worse
> > > than the Soviet authorities of old, or the (Zionist allowed)
> victory of
> > > jihad 2.0?
> > >
> >
>