-
Jun 15View SourceThis quote from the `Protocols' illustrates the definition we tried to arrive at of `terrorism in message 929 (`War/Terrorism'), which, while it may not have brought out clearly enough the conspiratorial character of this phenomenon, cautioned against the irresponsible idealistic tendency, widespread in some White traditionalist circles close to Muslim factions, to "easily see, in the phenomenon of today's Muslim 'suicide bombers', a supra-personal heroism of a type identical to that of the Japanese kamikaze pilots that Evola describes therein". (Metaphysics of War, p. 12)
Regarding more specifically `fall flags' operations, it is interesting to note that the term originates in naval warfare. From the seventeenth century ships have sailed under a flag identifying their nationality. In times of war, ships would sometimes change the national flag they flew in order to trick and deceive other vessels they sought to attack or escape from. They would fly a `false flag'. This strengthens the assumption that the current predatory and parasitic system was first tested at sea, before being slowly implemented on land.
The term then expanded to mean any covert military or paramilitary operations designed to deceive in such a way that the operation appears as though it is being carried out by other entities, groups or nations than those who actually planned and executed them. `False flag' operations were theorised by a British colonel named Frank Kitson in his books `Gangs and Countergangs' (1960) and `Low-intensity operations' (1971) (B. Zwicker, Towers of Deception : The Media Cover-up Of 9/11, p. 263). In `Sacrifici umani - Stati Uniti : I signori della guerra', J. Kleeves points out that most of the 200 wars declared by the United States were so as a result of false flag operations. Declassified documents are there to prove it. For a long time, most `false flag' operations were carried out, if not in enemy territory, at least at sea. In relatively recent times, they have tended to be perpetrated at home. This can be easily explained by the fact that home is no longer home, since alien elements are now fully in control of our countries. Their enemies us - are within. "Islamic terrorism" is a manufactured weapon, which is used with more or less discretion : few French remember that, only a few years ago, the mayor of a French town in the most exotic suburbs of Paris was wire-taped by a jealous secretary as he was asking the no less exotic head of the town gymnasium to send some most exotic young sportsmen to burn it down at night ; nor does, of course, the prosecutor.
A politically-motivated `Muslim' terrorist act from time to time in our countries makes all the protagonists happy : so-called far-right splinter parties or groups can release their frustration by demonstrating angrily on the streets for a couple of days about `Muslims', criticising noisily the `government' and letting some of their hotheads try for the sixth time to burn down a mosque, while the `government' and its agencies will not fail to reiterate that "the terrorists are just a minority of Muslims", etc, and far-left sects and the drumbeaters of `national reconciliation' will use quite cunningly the well-founded argument that `Islamic terrorism' is a Globalist creature in order to clear `Muslims' and to charge `governments'. It is the same lines again and again.
Reality may be stranger than fiction, and yet, looking closely without audio at the footage of the latest terrorist attacks in so-called Western countries, especially at that which occurred last month in Woolwich ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFm2OnIJs4w - http://www.dailymotion.com/fr/relevance/search/woolwich+hoax/1#video=x105d5f), where a guy, beheaded on a sidewalk, stopped bleeding, as soon as his corpse, dragged onto the pavement by his aggressor, who wears a bullet-proof vest, unless it's a cactus, reached the pavement, on which "Brave onlookers [tried] to help" him by chatting, their excuse being that it is not easy to help a beheaded man, one gets the rather different impression that fiction and reality meet.
"All the world's a stage, And all the men and women merely players: They have their exits and their entrances; And one man in his time plays many parts, »
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "tlefranc10" <tlefranc10@...> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> The goal of most "terrorist attacks" is, according to the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion", to strike fear into the heart of the people and make them look "outside" and not "inside", both in a geographical meaning and an ontological meaning, i. e. to reinforce the idea that "every Western citizen lives in a great and free democratic country (with an equally great government which protects its citizens) which bad and foreign terrorists wish to destroy".
>
> I am not sure whether the Woolwich attack and the one which happened in France a few days later should be regarded as operations set up by "our" "governments": many third-world psychopaths do enter European countries every day due to the open border policy.
>
> About the "war on terror" you have mentioned, I found this thread http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=1575 on the fakeness of some military casualties very intuitive.
>
> --- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "rouesolaire" <rouesolaire@> wrote:
> >
> > About the Soviet invasion (and not that of democracies), there is an introductory video for those who do not know about. Obviously, as a white nationalist, he didn't see that the behaviour of the Soviet troups was mainly due to their racial origins, that is to say they were Asians, mongrels and Slavics.
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1fLq8pAPgGE (start 3.10)
> >
> > The grotesque of some recent events like the alledged killing of Bin Laden with the famous "photography" as a "proof" and the Woolwich attack has maybe a certain purpose, to test the credulity of the populace. Of course, the result was to be expected, the populace believes everything the media tells them.
> >
> >
> > --- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "tlefranc10" <tlefranc10@> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Julius: No, I have never heard of this particular attempt to demonize Germans. In France, we are regularly bombarded, through TV and newspapers especially, with programmes saying how bad the French were with Africa, with the Jews, etc. The demonization of Germans for what they supposedly have done in WW II is also very strong, of course.
> > >
> > > Rouesolaire: I am deeply aware of every topic that you have mentioned. If I did not mention the "shoah", it is because, to me, this issue has been settled for a long time. In my opinion, an issue which deserves more consideration is the planned murder by the Americans and the Soviets of, it would seem, millions of German soldiers and civilians after May 1945, through executions, bad treatment (including numerous cases of Germans made slaves for decades by the Americans, working in salt mines and such) and planned undernourishment. James Bacque, who has written a lot on this, has claimed that about 9 million Germans were murdered by Americans alone, through the means mentioned above. The Germans have really been the most persecuted people in Europe.
> > >
> > > You may also be interested in the novel "So weit die Füsse tragen" based on the true story of a former German soldier made a slave in Siberia, who managed to escape in 1955 and reach Germany. There has been a movie made on this story in 2001 which is not bad.
> > >
> > > We have to be careful when we analyzing the tactics of the "counter-initiation" forces and not spend too much time on superficial things. For example, the fact that most show business "stars" have made "satanic" gestures does not tell much. It only proves that it is "trendy" among this class of people or that they have learned it in, for example, masonic lodges; I doubt they have any knowledge on what they are doing.
> > >
> > > The two websites I have posted may indeed be a little fanciful and I do not say I agree with their ultimate conclusions. However, their skills in detecting "photoshopped" images, for example, is of great interest.
> > >
> > > I think one must be open-minded in the positive sense of the term when studying how the "counter-initiation" forces act. As we know, the bigger the lie the more people will believe it. That is why we must be ready to challenge things such as whether planes actually crashed in the towers, even if it is only an unimportant technicality, as evola_as_he_is said.
> > >
> > > Evola_as_he_is: this is an interesting development on the "eye" symbol. I will mention the origin and the meaning of this "eye" in the document I have written.
> > >
> >
>
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
Thank You !
Thank you for being a great customer.
We made changes to your Y! Groups experience. Take a quick tour.