--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "fitzknob" <fitzknob@...>
wrote:
Let me play devils advocate on this question: What then is to be the
way towards the revival of the western spirit? More specifically,
what great work should this manner bund elite draw from? I say this
on the pretext of Guenons scepticism of conjoining and compositing
traditions.
Other than for the purposes of propaganda (if even that), there is absolutely no need to construct anything new, nor any need for compositing - though perhaps an element of the comparative is required. Everything worthwhile has already been created. Attempts to create new traditions usually leave things which appear like cults or pop-culture fads, and as seen by anyone who studies 'new religions' as they are generously called, they seldom survive the death of their creator, as they have as one of their defining features a strong dependence on the charisma/will of their founder. Once the founder expires, that is that.
We've had Manichaeism, Catharism ,the Templars, freemasonry etc,
yet none could quite shake off the judeo-Christian mythos. Are we
therefore left , with the regal art of hermetics or al-kemi , the
last standing traditions of Aryan antiquity or something more
derived from the lost hyperborean light , fragmented but exemplified
on our myths?
The examples you just cited all derive from an element of Judeo-Christian mythos, so it should not be surprising that they could shake it off, as it was a central feature to start with. There is plenty of Aryan material to work with, if one is inclined to look for it.
>Perhaps the thunderbolt may be the final answer.
I have lost track of the flow of conversation at this point, but as to whoever cast this speculation I find it to be an impeccably good suggestion.