There is a passage in H. T. Hansen's article "Julius Evola und die
deutsche konservative Revolution" [Criticón 158 (April/Mai/June 1998)
pp. 16-32] that would interest some of us here to a certain extent...
Yes, `to a certain extent', as Hansen claims in it that Evola
contributed to Coudenhove-Kalergi's publication Pan-Europa, while not
substantiating this claim.
In the article in question the author speaks at a certain point about
Evola publishing in Prinz Karl Anton von Rohan's "Europäische Revue".
What follows then is a paragraph called VON ROHAN'S IDEA'S ABOUT
EUROPE where is being explained that Von Rohan's views on a European
order differ very much from those of Coudenhove-Kalergi and his Pan-
Europa Movement. Added is then that <start quote>Evola clearly stood
much closer to the principles of von Rohan, which didn't prevent him
to publish also in the editorial of von Coudenhove-
Kalergi, "Paneuropa".<end quote> (roughly translated from the Dutch
translation of the article).
Since the group owner has shed the necessary light on Coudenhove-
Kalergi and the weltanschauung he actually represents, it would be
good to have this issue clarified.
As it now stands the claim appears to be dubious in nature, as it
lacks a further explanation and has no note attached to it (while
throughout the article there are a lot of notes!).
If there is indeed truth to it, than we must also ask the question
how well informed Evola was about the editorial and it's contents.
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "evola_as_he_is"
<evola_as_he_is@...> wrote:
>
> Let's get this straight : there are professions which should be
> forbidden to women, and which, as a matter of fact, were forbidden
to
> women, in their own interest and, beyond this, in the interest of
the
> whole community of white racial skin, on the basis of their nature,
in
> traditional societies of Aryan origin. "Citizen assemblies, the
> senate, a set of largely annual magistracies, and the courts of law
> which regulated these constituted the government of the Roman
> republic. All these jobs and activities were forbidden to women.
Women
> did not vote, did not hold public office, did not speak in
assemblies
> and did not serve as judges or jurors. Situations in which women did
> enter this sphere were taken as outrageous exceptions and used to
> reinforce the traditional boundaries." "(...) Provincial governance,
> international relations, and the military were also strictly male
> domains." Still in 'Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the
Roman
> empire', B. Severy tells us how "Livy explores the decay of Roman
> society which led to the disaster of his own day in part through a
> presentation of a debate on the repeal of the lex Oppea [a Roman law
> created in 215 BCE and canceled in 195 BCE, limiting how much gold
> women could have, forbidding women from wearing dresses of too many
> colors and driving in a horse-drawn vehicle too close to the City
> unless for a religious rite]. The possibility of eliminating this
> sumptuary restriction of the Second Punic War on women's display and
> ownership of jewelry brought crowds of Roman women into the forum.
> the speech Livy gives to the law's advocate, Cato the Elder, depicts
> the impropriety of these women and the failure of their men to
control
> them as threats to the state :
>
> "If each of us, citizens, had been resolved to assert a husband's
> rights and authority in relation to his own wife, we should have
> less trouble with women altogether ; now our liberty, having been
> conquered at home, is also trampled on and crushed here in the forum
> due to a feminine lack of self control, and because we were unable
to
> hold individual women in check, we tremble before them as a group...
> [They want] you to abrogate the law which you have enacted by your
> votes, which you have tested by use for so many years and by
> experience, that is, [they want] that by lifting one law you should
> weaken the others." (see, for excerpts :
> http://books.google.com/books?
id=SBRN6HW8xEIC&pg=PA25&lpg=PA25&dq=reich+%22forbi\
> dden+to+women%
22&source=web&ots=EuWZobGzNx&sig=LOdrQzbZA_SbLBte6IBWD67s_lA#PPA41\
> ,M1
>
> The Imperium Evola called for is based on the same world-view, a
> world-view which is derived from principles antithetic to the
> pseudo-principles currently applied by those who, behind the scenes,
> pull the strings of the EU and of similar mafia-like organisations.
On
> the difference between the Imperium and modern imperialism, see
> http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id34.html and
> http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id54.html
>
> What is 'Le Cercle information'?
>
>
>
> --- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, andy@ wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, evola_as_he_is wrote:
> >
> > > Beyond the most anecdotal character of this sex crime, one has
to
> > > remain focused, and, in this respect, to remain focused means
to bear
> > > in mind that, as rightly pointed out in 'Revolt against the
Modern
> > > World', everything nowadays is basically stomach-centred. Hence
the
> > > increasing tyranny of economy and the aggravation of 'intestine
> > > conflicts'. It is not by chance that, for example, the system
created
> > > in 1972 to maintain a fluctuation margin between the EU
countries'
> > > currencies was named 'monetary snake'.
> > >
> > > To remain focused also means to bear in mind that any sex crime
is
> > > advertised on mass media as a screen smoke, as a means of
distracting
> > > Westerners' attention from the real issues, all the more easily
as
> > > most current Westerners either do not want to see the real
issues or
> > > cannot see them. Sex crime turns out to be the most effective
way of
> > > distracting their attention from the real issues. Every now and
then,
> > > especially in Anglo-Saxon countries, a political schemer is
involved
> > > in a sex scandal, and, as a result, he may even be asked to
resign
> > > from office. This shows just how low things have gotten in the
West.
> > > In a Western society worth of the name, these political
schemers would
> > > certainly be tried, but they would not be so for sex crimes. As
far as
> > > Whites are concerned, they would be tried, as well as their
family,
> > > for high treason.
> > >
> > > Incidentally, http://www.pehi.eu reveals itself in its true
colours
> > > when labeling an individual who once stated... "The future man
will be
> > > a mongrel. As for a Pan Europe, I wish to see there a Eurasian-
Negroid
> > > mixture with great variation in personality types (....) The
Jews
> > > shall take the leading positions, since good providence has
given
> > > Europe a spiritually superior race of nobility called the Jews."
> > > ('Praktischer idealismus', 1925)... a Fascist
> > > (http://www.pehi.eu/archives_2006.htm). Besides, one cannot but
note
> > > that, in the whole 'indictment', there is no mention of any
females :
> > > considering that the EU staff, as any other parasitic
institution's in
> > > the West, is increasingly feminine, and that the intrinsic
corruption
> > > of those mafia-like institutions is directly proportional to the
> > > number of females in their staff, this 'omission' is rather
> > > mouth-watering.
> > >
> >
> > Indeed, most people do not realize or do not consider it
important that
> > organizations such as the CIA and Pentagon are staffed with a
slight
> > majority of female employees.
> >
> > However, I'm new to the Le Cercle information, but as someone
that has
> > been following the CFR and all the usual suspects over the years I
> fail to
> > see what is surprising about their activities? Also, considering
the
> > anti-communist agenda that their members played during the Cold
War
> era,
> > what makes them insidious today, thay they are the hidden movers
of the
> > multicultural agenda of pan Europa? Even Evola called for an
imperium
> > Europa. Yes the EU is certainly a degenerate concoction, but is
it
> worse
> > than the Soviet authorities of old, or the (Zionist allowed)
victory of
> > jihad 2.0?
> >
>