Blatvatsky's follower Alice Bailey is even clearer on this matter.
See, for example, Esoteric Healing:
http://laluni.helloyou.ws/netnews/bk/healing/heal1077.html
As for the refutation? The facts, as they stand, certainly appear to
validate Blavatsky and Bailey.
Counteracting this trend is the reason for the reissue of
Evola's "Racial Education"
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "brightimperator"
<brightimperator@...> wrote:
>
> Evola acquainted himself with Theosophy at one point but
penetrated
> past its deeply counter-initiatic subversive teachings.
>
> Some misguided "idealists" have tried to find in Blavatsky a
> proponent of an esoteric Aryanism. Her root race ideology is
cited,
> and her apparent recognition of the spiritual superiority of the
> Aryan race, along with her anti-judaic observations. These naive
> people allege Blavatsky's real doctrine has been distorted by the
> multiculturalists and liberals infesting all organizations
nowadays.
> Whereas, in reality, germs of subversion were inherent in
Theosophy
> from the start:
>
> Witness the following disturbing article by Blavatsky:
>
>
http://www.blavatsky.net/blavatsky/arts/PrematureAndPhenomenalGrowths
> .htm
>
> In it, we see the really insane meaning of her "root race"
ideology:
> she prophecies Aryans, the supposed 5th root race, will outgrow
> their characteristic yet apparently 'unevolved' light, Caucasian
> features and become negroidal-colored mutants as they morph into
the
> superior 6th race!!
>
> "...the characteristics of the race that will follow ours are--a
> darker skin, shortened period of infancy and old age, or in other
> words a growth and development that in the present age (to the
> profane) appear quite miraculous."
>
> Did Evola ever present a refutation of theosophy?
>