Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

rouesolaire · rouesolaire@yahoo.fr | Group Member  - Edit Membership Start a Group | My Groups
evola_as_he_is · EVOLA AS HE IS

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 121
  • Category: Spirituality
  • Founded: Nov 19, 2004
  • Language: English

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
From the NYT   Topic List   < Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Reply < Prev Message  | 


Hello,

One of the purposes and functions of this list, as stated in
its 'welcome message' (that is, before Ya-Hoo changed the look of its
groups and this message was reduced to one line, the one in which we
make it clear that any message unrelated to Evola's work will be
deleted), is to review the reviews of Evola's books which may be
published here and there on the InterNet and elsewhere, especially
those written in English.

Here is a most recent one: http://richardpoe.com/column.cgi?
story=123, at which the reader is invited to have a look before
reading our comments on it.

...


This journalist, whose more famous homonym happened to die a few
months after he had taken interest in Masonic America; this
journalist, who claims to have been introduced to Evola's work by the
manic who claimed to have introduced American readers to Evola's work
two or three tears ago, cannot but know who's behind the U.S. and
who's behind the E.U. and that it is the same individuals who are
behind both, but he's a New York Times' journalist, isn't he? Despite
de Sade's sarcastic claim, dung cannot be expected to smell nice, can
it?

As a NYT' journalist, he works for people whose interest is to fuel
hatred between European natives and Americans, just as his colleagues
in Europe work for people whose interest is to fuel hatred between
European natives, to make currently occupied Europe implode. Once
again, it's the old 'divide and rule'. The so-called 'neo-
conservatives' who are behind the U.S.I. are experts on paleo-
machiavellianism.

However, there is nothing fundamentally wrong in his over-
simplification of Evola's views, except for what he put forward in
the "third step": Evola distinguished between two kinds of
nationalism: on one hand, the Masonic-Jewish-inspired nationalism of
the XIXth century which led to the dismantling of the Habsburg Empire
and, more generally, to the collapse of the structures of traditional
Europe, to the formation of the Jacobine Nation-State, which was only
a step towards the destruction of the State and of the nation which
Europe is currently facing, and, on the other hand, XXth century
nationalism, which tried to prevent this destruction through an
organic process of reconstruction along racial lines in which Evola
saw an opportunity to form a European empire based on traditional
Aryan values, far from the Jewish mercantilist one set up by
D'Israeli and whose abolition Evola he called for. The nationalism
whose abolition Evola called for is the former; it is so true that,
in the chapter XVI of 'Men among the Ruins', he speaks of a "national
reorganisation", through the acknowledgment of a tangible principle
of authority, as a basis of an organic, anti-individualist and
corporative structure of the political and social forces of every
single country, and, then, of a "supra-national reorganisation". But,
then again, many journalists who claim to know Evola's work and to
have 'introduced' it to other journalists haven't even noticed this
fundamental distinction between 'catagogic' nationalism
and 'anagogic' nationalism. Would it be that the new specialist of
Evola's work in Anglo-Saxon countries hasn't actually read 'Men among
the Ruins' throughout and he relies on articles written by other
journalists on 'Men among the Ruins', who haven't read it throughout
either?

Please note that all the references he gave to 'Men among the ruins'
are found within 12 pages, from page 274 to page 286

Please also note that this journalist takes care not to hint at
Evola's racial works. He's not the only one.

However, it could be expected from a journalist working for such
newspaper: it is not in the interest of the individuals he works for
to draw people's attention on the racial conception put forward by
Evola and which is poles apart from the zoological racism which is
peculiar to the Jew. If this conception based on the most ancient
Aryan teachings, according to which, among other things, to be
biologically white doesn't mean in any way to be white from the point
of view of the race of the soul and of the race of the spirit, spread
and found an echo among some people, the political schemers who are
currently in office throughout the West and the decision-makers who
follow them about like shadow would, so to speak, show their true
colours.

Thompkins&Cariou










Mon Apr 25, 2005 7:02 pm

evola_as_he_is
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
< Prev Message  | 
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hello, One of the purposes and functions of this list, as stated in its 'welcome message' (that is, before Ya-Hoo changed the look of its groups and this...
evola_as_he_is Offline Send Email Apr 25, 2005
7:03 pm

I find particularly humorous the fact that this author feels the need to link Evola to the present "war on terror." Apparently, Europe is responsible for ...
Michael Lord
ouro_boros Offline Send Email
Apr 26, 2005
9:45 am

Hello, Anything a journalist of the establishment can think of to make Americans feel that European natives hate them is good for business. For, as pointed out...
evola_as_he_is Offline Send Email Apr 26, 2005
2:04 pm

Well, you have to bear in mind american incomprehension of the category of the collective, which is simply absent from american political 'thought'. Consider...
Rowan Berkeley
rowan_berkeley Offline Send Email
Apr 26, 2005
10:36 am

Copyright © 2012 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Guidelines NEW - Help