"In April 1988, several weeks before I was awarded a PhD degree in political
science at the University of California–Santa Barbara, I had a private and
casual dinner with a famous author of human ecology, professor emeritus Garrett
Hardin. After a beer or two, he told me, if I recall his words well: "Look, Tom,
I have been lecturing in biology; I can get away with saying things to my
students about race that you will never ever be able to in humanities."
Being young and living in the allegedly freest country in the world, I did not
exactly understand what he meant. Years later I grasped the meaning of his
words. I realized that there are academic fields in humanities that are subject
to strict inquisitorial control and to undisputed canons of political rectitude.
This sacred triangle consists of three subjects: a) modern historiography; b)
Jewish power and influence; and c) the race question. Lecturing on these topics
in an open an honest way on these topics means receiving a kiss of academic
death.
Intellectual terror in American colleges is well-hidden behind the garb of
feigned academic conviviality and the "have-a-wonderful-day" rhetoric of
superficially friendly peers. Yet is has far more insidious effects than the
naked terror I experienced in a drab ex-Communist Europe.
Apart from being a derogatory, value-laden word that immediately lends itself to
an array of catastrophic fantasies and judgment day scenarios, the word "Nazi"
also gives birth to a schizoid behavior among a number of White nationalists,
particularly in America. Many of them seriously project in their minds National
Socialist Germany as a country populated by Albino-like Nordic-Übermenschen)
possessing a hidden force that could be resuscitated any day either in Patagonia
or on astral UFO's. As noted previously in TOO (see hereand here), the false
reenactment of political events leads to their farcical repetition — with
dangerous political consequences. In our postmodernity, the overkill of false
images leads to the real kill. The often rowdy and infantile behavior of such
"proud Aryan internet warriors" scares off serious White people who could
otherwise be of some help in these decisive days of struggle for Western
civilization. We must ask ourselves: Cui bono? Who benefits?
Indeed, the surreal image of National Socialism as exclusively Nordic has been
promoted by the left — antifascist scholars, environmentalists, Freudo-Boasians,
various Jewish and pro-Jewish academic think tanks, the caviar-left, the gated
community White liberals, etc. How? For decades they have been cranking out an
overkill of one-sided books and movies on National Socialism and racism, and
this for two simple reasons. First, it pays well and provides lush media and
academic sinecures. Secondly, there has been a well-conceived pedagogical
project ever since 1945 to prevent a critical reexamination of race and racism.
The Many Faces of National Socialism
For starters, the second most powerful National Socialist man in the Third Reich
was a dark-haired "shrunken German" ("nachgedunkelter Schrumpfgermane"), the
proverbial Joseph Goebbels, a thin man, little over 5 feet tall, whose stature
and face resembled more an ancient Roman quaestor than a blond fighting
machine. His thin lips, a round protruding back head (occiput), sad, yet very
sharp eyes, testified to a man who under different historical circumstances
would have made an excellent professor in comparative literature. Goebbels was
born in the German province of Westphalia, close to France. In the 1st century
ad, this area was an important Roman military outpost and a region in which many
Germans today still show distinct Mediterranean facial traits."
More at
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Sunic-RaceIII.html