It is not certain that the non-Jewish lineage of Jesus is only
a 'fabrication of the Talmud of Babylon'. Other early non-Talmudic
sources also testify of Jesus' non-Jewish lineage and mission (as
the analysis below demonstrates). Also, to preclude any possible
misunderstandings: that I address the issue of non-Jewish, Indo-
Persian, or Aryan Christianity merely means I am a hunter after the
truth. The blood of the petty, deluded, exoteric religious sectarian
typical of the modern age is not in me. Yet I do agree with the
realism of C.G. Jung that the Christ symbol is psychologically
inescapable and remains part of the Western psyche and culture. As
the Christ symbol is psychologically necessary and is an
irrepressible part of the Western self-understanding and heritage,
would a de-feminized, knightly, hierarchical-initiatory Christianity
resurrected on an 'ariognostic' and Eckhartian basis, the "regal
religion of (the pre-Abrahamic Aryan priest-king) Melchizedek" Evola
praises, perhaps be a good collective unifying strategy for re-
energizing the Indoeuropean peoples of the West in the inevitable
conflict with contrary forces?
Anyone interested in these questions would benefit from reading the
following highly informative, scholarly, and suggestive analyses:
Gnostic Origins of Alfred Rosenberg's Thought
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v04/v04p335_Whisker.html
JOHN THE BAPTIST AND JESUS, ARYAN SUN-FIRE PRIESTS
http://www.antiqillum.com/texts/bg/Qadosh/qadosh016.htm