Thank you for setting me straight on this issue.
As the adage goes, If one does not ask one will can never find out.
Nevertheless, and ad hominem arguments to the side; my posing of the
question was only in tandem to actually exploring how far Evola was
consistent with his own particular approach to theory.
In so doing, I was trying to disentangling the web, so to speak of
homosexuality, eroticism and the so called traditional 'values'
regarding women. I thought that, in making a somewhat moralistic
tone one could truly pertain to get a clearer picture of how radical
one can be against feminism per se. Therefore without falling into
the trap of the praying mantis; caught between three extremes of
women hatred and/or the sublimination of modern effeminate man
and/or the seemingly pederasty of a 'gents only club'.
Similarly, it would be correct to say that, this is also why I used
the somewhat garbled and sensationalist example of the racial
thinking by a Nordic rock star. I wished to examine the absurdity,
that underlines this thinking regarding with-in group racialism,
i.e. Mediterranean type versus Nordic type (whatever that is?).
Additionally, as you have mentioned 'the theatrics' of so-
called 'Satanists', personally I cannot see a difference between
them and their Evangelistic counterparts. They are seemingly both
products of Guenon's hypotheses on low level psychic garbage...
Moreover, all this being said, it only reinforces my opinion, that I
decide for myself, how I should or should not behave towards
females, irrespective of ideology or be it, the raving fantasies of
some bewildered Teutonic axe-welder or an intellectual demagogue.
Again, thank you for reply and to note I do not like dancing over a
dead man's private life.