Your tone, Toni, is so entirely condescending as to be baiting.
Utterly and unnecessarily pompous.
> It is your utter ignorance of the texts you are promoting that
amuses us.
Yeah, I haven't read them yet. That's true. Why that's amusing to
you is not at all clear to me. From what I have read, it's seems to
me that Evola was originally part of a student group interested in
creating an intellectual vanguard around which a political movement
could "crystallize," as he says. How he progressed later in life I
don't know. Apparently he came to the conclusion that any effort at
transformation was entirely futile, given our post-war
predicament . This is not an attitude I subscribe to, despite
appearances.
>And it is the parasitical nature of your task that repulses us.
In order to be a parasite I'd have to make some kind of profit from
my activities.
I'm really not interested in arguing with you about it. Controversy
for its own sake doesn't interest me. I'm a political activist, not
an academic. What I would be interested in is the text of page 150
of "Men Among the Ruins," if anyone would be kind enough to provide
that.