You still haven't understood the spirit of this list.
The welcome message says : "Not a moment of our time will be wasted
upon the "demon of dialectics", rambling about questions which were
solved ages ago. For instance, we do not intend to waste time trying
to determine whether or not this or that ethnic, political, economic,
or social entity or force played a part in the movement of subversion
which led to the destruction of the traditional Western world. Our
aim will be, rather, to study the method by which this subversion was
conducted by this well-known entity, according to what strategies,
and by means of what tactics". In the same way, we do not intend to
waste time trying to determine whether or not Aryanity, whose
concept, by the way, didn't exist in ancient Rome, exists. Instead,
we work on the principle that Aryanity does exist, that there is a
special spiritual heritage to Aryanity, and, on that basis, we study
it, especially through the works of an author who was a living proof
of the reality of Aryanity. Call it a 'subjective idea' if that makes
you feel better.
Is it fu-lly understood?
--- In
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "Rowan Berkeley"
<rowan_berkeley@y...> wrote:
>
> I agree that the translation could be less florid, Tony, but it is
the underlying thoughts I question :
>
> (1) the idea that there is a special spiritual heritage to aryanity
>
> (2) the idea that we are the inheritors of this aryanity
>
> -- both these ideas are subjective and arbitrary in my opinion.
>
>
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all
new Yahoo! Security Centre.
http://uk.security.yahoo.com
>