I am not a Heidegger guy--except where Heidegger resonates with medieval
theology. Anyway--"neo-Idealism" is just a term--is "post-Kantian Idealism" less
unsuitable? Words, semantics... But Evola, in spite of his Eastern and medieval
spiritual education , I believe is following the specific Germanic
transcendentalist Idealism somewhere near SCHELLING, and squeezing it strongly
for the last drop of insight...
Vico...Schelling..."trans-rationalistic rationalism" of the Eliadian
phenomenologist of Numinous experience...theosophically-filtered,
esoteric-Hyperborean "neo-Theosophia"...? Evola outdid Fichtean subjectivist
solipsism in his "magical Idealism" already, deepening matters...so...where
exactly does he belong, analytically...?
Heck, at least I didn't call Evola a "neo-Stirnerian, neo-Sorelian Nietzschean
pathological case" like some academic idiots...
I lament Heidegger's failure to uphold transcendent, arch-principial reality
against the ravages of Judaic demoplutocratic intellectual demolition,
neo-Gramscian contagion of sub-humanism, and techno-capitalist, materialist
Nihilism. The de-souled mechanization of life only needed to be answered by
aggressive counter-assertion of qualitative spiritual imagination. Heidegger is
a tangled bog--regressive elements vying with superior elements...Nietzschean
romanticism interwoven with Eckhartian apophatic negativistic theology of the
Middle Ages...
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, Asdfasdsfdas Sfsdf <andreforcordelia@...>
wrote:
>
> What is "neo-idealism?"
>
> Do you meantranscendental Idealism like Kant and Fichte?
>
> Let me guess, you are a Heidegger-guy?
>
>
> That would be the only way this pointed question could be understood in a way
that it could be responded to.
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: R.P. <brightimperator@...>
> To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, April 8, 2012 10:01 AM
> Subject: [evola_as_he_is] Evolian Meta-Philosophy
>
>
>
> Evola derives Tradition from pure integral metaphysical Being itself; yet
humanly, the locus of Evola in mundane philosophic history is best characterized
how...? Evola continues continental neo-Idealism almost to the point of
outpacing it...and then his "static gnosis of platonic being" seems to suggest
his neo-Plotinian main impetus...
>
> How would the erudite moderator describe the place of Evola in terms of the
philosophy of existence and Western thinking...? Thx for your time.
>