Re: Satanism ( was: Start your new year right! .....activate yourself)
Recalling, my readings of the NSDAP, it seems all these variations
on a sinister theme, would I take it be liquated… In the second book
by Goodrick-Clarke, Black Sun, groupings such as Christian identity,
Nazi Satanism and Nordic paganism seemingly set themselves up as the
prime candidates of all that is the most vulgar of Americana.
Notwithstanding, the faddism within Europe for the most bizarre; one
can clearly see, the most abstruse and diabolical being passed off
as being of pure 'Olympian value'. I believe this is what those
Judaic mystics called Klippoth, a black hole of degenerate forces
something akin to what the modern world excels in. Is it not sub-
culture idols such as Crowley and those groupings from the OTO to
the ONA are parodies of themselves as of the most ludicrous kind. It
is not surprising then to have seen the late Anton S. LaVey prowling
around Hollywood with that house Negro Sammy Davis Junior and the
other wise guys of the celebrated Rat Pack. This is the fabric of
criminality and subversion in its most burlesque or vaudeville type
of expression.
Returning to racial doctrine and Satanism, it seems that the so
called ex-spokesperson of the ONA, wrote the most diabolical dribble
this side of Rosenberg. As for Mr Rice and his colleagues, he is an
entertainer and clown figure that keeps coming up in those Tarot
cards that old women use…
On the other hand, is this something that is inherent and to be
expected when a certain civilisation collapses in unto itself??
I quote you these passages from ' Three Aspects of the Jewish
Problem' page 10. 2003/1936
'On the whole, it is classical style of self-control and action, a
love of clarity, difference and personality, an Olympian ideal of
divine and heroic super-humanity, together with an ethos of loyalty
and honour, that characterises the Aryan spirit.'
This is a far cry from these nefarious sub-lunar organisations I
have mentioned above.
'In this way, even if briefly, the basic point of reference is
given. These fundamentals of an ideal antithesis must be borne in
mind. This antithesis must serve as our basis for evaluating all the
historical reality and the global state of civilisations often show
us in a mixed state. It would be absurd, regarding times that are
not absolutely primordial, to want to try and find again the Aryan
element or the Semitic element in an absolutely pure state, whoever
they are thought to be. ' (Page. 10)
Notice, that the mixed state he refers too, is the global state of
civilisations in 1936.
Today of course there is only one state in 2006 that of mammon.
|