Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

rouesolaire · rouesolaire@yahoo.fr | Group Member  - Edit Membership Start a Group | My Groups
evola_as_he_is · EVOLA AS HE IS

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 121
  • Category: Spirituality
  • Founded: Nov 19, 2004
  • Language: English

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Hear how Yahoo! Groups has changed the lives of others. Take me there.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Evola and Darwinism   Topic List   < Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Reply  |  Next Message > 
Vedr. [evola_as_he_is] Evola and Evolution & Darwinism

Swasti!

The most dangerous and deceitful feature of Darwinism
is the amalgamation of two thing that should always be
kept separate in scientific concideration: the relults
(observations) and discussion (conclusions)
There are spontanous mutations, there is natural
secection. It's obvious to everybody that it is
possible to transfer a yellow canary into a red one by
zoological breedingbut til now nobody could generate a
canary from an amoeba or from the "primordial soup".
The fully unjustifiable coclusion is the statement
that every mutation and every change are positiv. This
is the popular acpect of darwinism, which is a perfect
tool in the hands of the subversion.
"This is better simply because it is new" Isn't is a
common oppinion?
This is wrong and nothing but wishfull thinking. Also
a correct view on paleontology shows a nearly total
accordance with the cyclic view of history. Whole
groups of arts develop, reach their zenits and perish.
Think about dinosaures, amonites,
Other examples such as trilobites or the "evolution"
of the languages expose an even more devolutive
feature:
They appear at once in their full complexity and
become more and more primitive.
Such facts are rather unwelcome by the darwinists, but
they are the normal case in nature, not only a lucky
hazard or just wishfull thinking.

Harigastiz


--- lordofthespear <hailtocryptogram@...>
skrev:

> Apart from the point that Evola sees Darwinism as a
> modernistic and
> progressivist theory (from apes to human beings) and
> views human history
> as a fall from a god-like state, I know no further
> explanations for his
> anti-Darwinism. When reading Walker's strange claim
> that the idea of
> evolution is not in conflict with Traditionalism, I
> wonder what the
> Tradionalist view on Darwinism in general is.
> From `The Darwin
> Inheritance' by Michael Walker:
> "Man alone of the animals on this planet is able to
> freely choose
> the direction of his evolution. Free choice is the
> choice to halt one
> kind of evolution in favour of another or of none.
> To talk of "human
> progress" is more problematic than to talk of "human
> evolution" for progress implies a destination,
> evolution does not.
> What is more, evolution allows, even implies, the
> turning of a cycle,
> whereas progress implies that what is in progress is
> in the process of
> moving towards a set target. And just as the
> genealogy of a species is a
> cycle, so is the life of man, and if Spengler, Evola
> and the
> traditionalist authors are to be believed, so are
> human orders and ages.
> But there is nothing in the history of the earth
> which contradicts this:
> quite the contrary, the history of the Earth is a
> history of cycles,
> cold and warm phases, quiet and volcanic phases. At
> the same time
> changes take place which are irreversible: the Earth
> does not expect the
> return of the dinosaurs, at least not in identical
> form. One day the
> Earth will be roasted, for our Sun will not exist
> for ever but before it
> dies will expand into a red giant and consume this
> planet. Suns are born
> and die "like the rest of us". The existence of
> historical
> cycles of the return of forms of civilisation and
> forms of man does not
> conflict with a theory of evolution as such, but it
> does contradict
> unilinear theories of evolution, that is to say
> those that argue that a
> species begins in one place and at one time and
> moves always in one
> direction and in one line from the point of
> departure. Evolution is not
> in contradiction with traditionalism but it is in
> contradiction with
> creationism, the argument that each species of plant
> and animal was
> generated (created) spontaneously in a moment by an
> extraneous force and
> for a certain purpose which cannot be changed. The
> belief that life was
> created in its variety by a higher being and the
> providence of life and
> death controlled utterly by that being, this indeed
> is incompatible with
> a belief that the variety of life is formed as the
> result of a reaction
> to the force of multifarious agencies and events
> working upon the
> natural object."
>
>






Sun Mar 5, 2006 10:42 pm

widar_hariga...
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 |  Next Message > 
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Apart from the point that Evola sees Darwinism as a modernistic and progressivist theory (from apes to human beings) and views human history as a fall from a...
lordofthespear Offline Send Email Feb 16, 2006
10:00 am

I haven't read the beginning of this thread, so forgive me if I repeat anything. ... Rene Guenon believed much the same thing, describing Western civilisation...
Troy Southgate
arktoslondon Offline Send Email
Feb 16, 2006
1:22 pm

Is it not because Mr. Walker is trying to compare and level Darwinism and Traditionalism on the same 'hight'? lordofthespear <hailtocryptogram@...>...
Blazing Productions
blazingprodu... Offline Send Email
Feb 16, 2006
1:22 pm

Swasti! The most dangerous and deceitful feature of Darwinism is the amalgamation of two thing that should always be kept separate in scientific concideration:...
Widar Wulfarson
widar_hariga... Offline Send Email
Mar 6, 2006
9:37 am

Copyright © 2012 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Guidelines NEW - Help