He surely did, in an essay we mentioned in our presentation of his
relations with the 'Independent Theosophical Association of Rome'. It
is called 'Critics of Theosophy, and is found in 'Maschera e volto
dello spiritualismo contemporaneo' (1932).
That article by Blavatsky, which you have been well inspired to post,
shows, if need be, that Theosophists are experts in the art of
distortion of an Aryan past which they pretend to unearth and
resuscitate.
--- In
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "brightimperator"
<brightimperator@...> wrote:
>
> Evola acquainted himself with Theosophy at one point but penetrated
> past its deeply counter-initiatic subversive teachings.
>
> Some misguided "idealists" have tried to find in Blavatsky a
> proponent of an esoteric Aryanism. Her root race ideology is cited,
> and her apparent recognition of the spiritual superiority of the
> Aryan race, along with her anti-judaic observations. These naive
> people allege Blavatsky's real doctrine has been distorted by the
> multiculturalists and liberals infesting all organizations
nowadays.
> Whereas, in reality, germs of subversion were inherent in Theosophy
> from the start:
>
> Witness the following disturbing article by Blavatsky:
>
>
http://www.blavatsky.net/blavatsky/arts/PrematureAndPhenomenalGrowths
> .htm
>
> In it, we see the really insane meaning of her "root race"
ideology:
> she prophecies Aryans, the supposed 5th root race, will outgrow
> their characteristic yet apparently 'unevolved' light, Caucasian
> features and become negroidal-colored mutants as they morph into
the
> superior 6th race!!
>
> "...the characteristics of the race that will follow ours are--a
> darker skin, shortened period of infancy and old age, or in other
> words a growth and development that in the present age (to the
> profane) appear quite miraculous."
>
> Did Evola ever present a refutation of theosophy?
>