This point cannot be too strongly emphasised : "It has been said, by
a Jew, that, just as Adam was formed by Jehovah, the Jew was formed
by the Jewish law, and this truth is not limited to the Judaism of
the Old Testament, whose spiritual history has been much more
eventful than is assumed, but extends also to the Judaism of the
Diaspora, in which it becomes even more emphatically the case, since
the Talmud appears as the real essence and the real soul of Judaism."
Since this is taken from
http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id16.html/ and Evola states at the
beginning of this essay that "For a real presentation of the Jewish
question, it is necessary to distinguish, in the whole Jewish
reality, three elements or aspects", we may go further : the Talmud
is especially the real essence of the third category of Jew defined
by Evola, that is "the Jew as creature of the Jewish law, and as
conscious instrument of the Jewish law."
Incidentally, in the light of that excerpt of the Talmud which you
have quoted, one would have to be Jewishised to the core not to
realise what the word 'human' really means and stands for - what is
hidden behind it - in the expression 'human rights'.
--- In
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "vandermok" <vandermok@...>
wrote:
>
> The Bible is a Jewish document but secondary, for the Jews, if
compared to the Talmud, where we find: "The Hebrews are called men,
the peoples of the world are note called men but beasts", so the idea
of a fornication with a demon could really cover a racial
hybridising...but for the Jews, the demons are not the Negro or the
troglodytes but every 'goy'.
> About the Bible, note that in the beginning Romans looked at the
Christians only as another fanatic Jewish sect from Palestine,
already a mine of Messiahs.
>
> As for the Ethiopians, inhabitants of the ancient Kush, there is a
legend in which they become black for being scalded by the crazy race
of the sun's Chariot driven by Phaeton, son of Helios/Phoebus, that
slain by Jupiter for having set the word on fire, fell into the river
that the Latins called Padus or Eridanus, a possible echo of an
original cosmic cataclysm.
>
> And since 'brightimperator' quotes the Pauline Letters eventually,
it's amusing that the Jews say St. Paul wrote them just after his
fall from the horse, "having hit the head": the scorn being the
very "genius of Israel".
> In
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com brightimperator
<brightimperator@...> wrote:
>
> With great esoteric significance, Leviticus 17. 7 reads: "They
ought
> not to sacrifice any more to the se'irim (satyrs, goat-demons),
with
> which they have committed fornication".
>
> To the ancients, satyrs were demons of goatlike or apelike form
> dwelling in ruins (Isaiah 13.21), symbols of immorality. To the
> ancients a demon was an ape (or similar being). Such a relationship
is
> explicitly evident in the works of a number of authors, including
> Horace, Seneca, Pliny, Ovid, and Virgil. A common idea in these
works
> is the depiction of Charon, the grim ferryman of Hades, not only as
> black-skinned, but as an Ethiopian (with snub nose and thick lips)
> (Hor. Odes II 13.21, Sen. Herc. Oet 1704-5, Pliny HN II 17, Ovid
Met.
> IV 436-8, Virgil Aen. VI 128).
>
> Thus, it is evident the inhabitants of Palestine committed
bastardizing
> fornication with these ape-people, and God had to forbid this
illicit
> intercourse strongly.
>
> Similarly, I. Cor. 10.20: "Ye can not drink from the cup of the
Lord
> and that of the demons at the same time" is interpreted as Sodomy.
>