Yet, this gratuitous caricature can be freely accessed from any
computer and it doesn't look like the individual who turned it out
has a book to sell. To go beyond the trivial character of that
gratuitous caricature, a famous former literature professor at the
French University of Lyon II who has been studying the "hoax of the
XXth century" for 3 decades is not wrong in stating that it is
his/her own fantasies that the distorter projects onto the object of
his work of distortion. Now, considering the notorious spirit of
tolerance of this distorter, he/she should be able, if not to
understand, at least to accept that not everyone is turned on by the
idea of washing with soap made of human fat.
Out of the falsehoods with which that caricature is riddled, we
forgot to mention that which consists in stating that "D'Evola" was
charged as a war criminal in 1945. Of course, he could have been
charged as a war criminal in 1945 by the allied tribunals and, as
many other Germans and Italians, tried according to the Talmudic
precepts which are applied to the goyim within the context of the so-
called 'Republican law', a proceeding which was once denounced by
Yockey. Yet, he was not even charged in 1945. For obvious reasons.
--- In
evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, Widar Wulfarson
<widar_harigastiz@y...> wrote:
>
> Sex sells, doesn't it?
> So take a "high ranking fascist", mix him with occult societies,
flavourt he whole thing with some ritual child abuse and you'll get a
perfect story.
> Lies are news
> truth is obsolete
>
> ... especially in internet
>
> evola_as_he_is <evola_as_he_is@y...> skrev:
> T
> his second caricature of Julius Evola is the doing of a certain
> Alexis Dolgorukii, who produced it at
>
http://www.parascience.org/whatis.htm
>
> Please hold your breath and, while you are at it, pinch your nose :
>
> "Now, there is some very clear evidence that Annie Besant was
> associated with Dr. & Baron, Julius D'Evola (Who was charged as a
War
> Criminal in 1945) and through D'Evola with Benito Mussolini, "Il
> Duce". She arranged for Mussolini to write articles for her
> magazine "Star of The Herald of the East", which was the organ of
the
> group designed to support the "Messiahship" of Jiddu Krishnamurti
> (who had absolutely nothing to do with all this as he was just a
> child). Copies are on file in both the Library of the American
> Theosophical Society in Olcott, Wheaton, Illinois and in The
Library
> in Adyar India. I am sure they are also on file elsewhere. But
> Mussolini's articles can be read by anyone who chooses to look them
> up. This is not a connection I think healthy for The Theosophical
> Society.
>
> Considering Annie Besant's immense authoritarianism, one is forced
to
> wonder what other qualities she shared with the Fascists? There is
> another very questionable connection here. Julius D'Evola was the
> primary disciple of Rene Guenon who wrote a book so critical of
> theosophy that it almost completely destroyed The Theosophical
> Movement in France. What was Annie Besant doing being a close
> associate of D'Evola who was the closest associate of a man who was
> on of the theosophical movement's greatest enemies. Why too, were
> other very close associates of both D'Evola and Guenon, like Alain
> Danielou and Raymond Burnier (ex husband of the present
International
> President of The Theosophical Society) so closely identified with
> Theosophy and Adyar in particular?
>
> I have long been wondering how Annie Besant, the friend (Mistress
for
> 12 years) of George Bernard Shaw, co-founder of the Fenian
socialist
> Movement, and famous Liberal, became associated with Julius D'Evola
> who was a very High Ranking Fascist, a close associate of Rene
Guenon
> who was a principle enemy of the theosophical movement, and like so
> many other people associated with Guenon, a homosexual, and like
many
> of his associates deeply involved in anti-altruistic magic. These
> people are not viewed by me as antithetical because of their
> homosexuality, after all I am myself a homosexual, but because of
the
> character of their sexual activities. Sexual Magick is a terribly
> abusive, oppressive, and harmful practice. It was the primary
feature
> of the Saturnian Order and regularly included ritual murder. In
many
> cases this practice included the sexual abuse of children (both
> heterosexual and Homosexual in nature) this is unforgivable by any
> standards, and anyone who so indulges the bestial side of human
> nature is worthy of the strongest condemnation."
>
> There is no evidence whatsoever that Besant, a disciple of
Blavatsky
> and her successor at the head of the Theosophical Society, "was
> associated with Dr. and Baron Julius D'Evola (sic)". Julius Evola,
> who called Theosophy an "extravagant" doctrine in 'Maschera e volto
> dello spiritualismo contemporaneo', was not a Dr. Nor is there any
> evidence whatsoever that "D'Evola" was a close associate of Alain
> Danielou, whose work is not quoted anywhere in Evola's, and Raymond
> Burnier. "D'Evola" was never a "very High Ranking Fascist" : he
never
> joined the Fascist party (he never joined any party in his whole
> life), in the first place. None of those who have known him
> intimately have ever noticed any homosexual tendencies in him ; not
> even her chambermaid felt the need to write a book about him after
> his death. Unlike others, he never disclosed his sexual orientation
> in his work.
>
> Now, it is not stated that "D'Evola" murdered children in ritual
> orgies, but it is not far from being strongly and cunningly
> suggested, by association of ideas and by a careful choice of
words,
> in the four juxtaposed following sentences : 1. "These people are
not
> viewed by me as antithetical because of their homosexuality, after
> all I am myself a homosexual, but because of the character of their
> sexual activities" ; 2 "Sexual Magick is a terribly abusive,
> oppressive, and harmful practice" ; 3. "It was the primary feature
of
> the Saturnian Order and regularly included ritual murder." ; 4. "In
> many cases this practice included the sexual abuse of children
(both
> heterosexual and Homosexual in nature) (...)".
>
> We have taken the time to mention this caricature because the
article
> in which it is found seems to be 'big in the Internet'.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>