Let's get this straight : there are professions which should be
forbidden to women, and which, as a matter of fact, were forbidden to
women, in their own interest and, beyond this, in the interest of the
whole community of white racial skin, on the basis of their nature, in
traditional societies of Aryan origin. "Citizen assemblies, the
senate, a set of largely annual magistracies, and the courts of law
which regulated these constituted the government of the Roman
republic. All these jobs and activities were forbidden to women. Women
did not vote, did not hold public office, did not speak in assemblies
and did not serve as judges or jurors. Situations in which women did
enter this sphere were taken as outrageous exceptions and used to
reinforce the traditional boundaries." "(...) Provincial governance,
international relations, and the military were also strictly male
domains." Still in 'Augustus and the Family at the Birth of the Roman
empire', B. Severy tells us how "Livy explores the decay of Roman
society which led to the disaster of his own day in part through a
presentation of a debate on the repeal of the lex Oppea [a Roman law
created in 215 BCE and canceled in 195 BCE, limiting how much gold
women could have, forbidding women from wearing dresses of too many
colors and driving in a horse-drawn vehicle too close to the City
unless for a religious rite]. The possibility of eliminating this
sumptuary restriction of the Second Punic War on women's display and
ownership of jewelry brought crowds of Roman women into the forum.
the speech Livy gives to the law's advocate, Cato the Elder, depicts
the impropriety of these women and the failure of their men to control
them as threats to the state :
"If each of us, citizens, had been resolved to assert a husband's
rights and authority in relation to his own wife, we should have
less trouble with women altogether ; now our liberty, having been
conquered at home, is also trampled on and crushed here in the forum
due to a feminine lack of self control, and because we were unable to
hold individual women in check, we tremble before them as a group...
[They want] you to abrogate the law which you have enacted by your
votes, which you have tested by use for so many years and by
experience, that is, [they want] that by lifting one law you should
weaken the others." (see, for excerpts :
http://books.google.com/books?id=SBRN6HW8xEIC&pg=PA25&lpg=PA25&dq=reich+%22forbi\
\
dden+to+women%22&source=web&ots=EuWZobGzNx&sig=LOdrQzbZA_SbLBte6IBWD67s_lA#PPA41\
\
,M1
The Imperium Evola called for is based on the same world-view, a
world-view which is derived from principles antithetic to the
pseudo-principles currently applied by those who, behind the scenes,
pull the strings of the EU and of similar mafia-like organisations. On
the difference between the Imperium and modern imperialism, see
http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id34.html and
http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id54.html
What is 'Le Cercle information'?
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, andy@... wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, evola_as_he_is wrote:
>
> > Beyond the most anecdotal character of this sex crime, one has to
> > remain focused, and, in this respect, to remain focused means to bear
> > in mind that, as rightly pointed out in 'Revolt against the Modern
> > World', everything nowadays is basically stomach-centred. Hence the
> > increasing tyranny of economy and the aggravation of 'intestine
> > conflicts'. It is not by chance that, for example, the system created
> > in 1972 to maintain a fluctuation margin between the EU countries'
> > currencies was named 'monetary snake'.
> >
> > To remain focused also means to bear in mind that any sex crime is
> > advertised on mass media as a screen smoke, as a means of distracting
> > Westerners' attention from the real issues, all the more easily as
> > most current Westerners either do not want to see the real issues or
> > cannot see them. Sex crime turns out to be the most effective way of
> > distracting their attention from the real issues. Every now and then,
> > especially in Anglo-Saxon countries, a political schemer is involved
> > in a sex scandal, and, as a result, he may even be asked to resign
> > from office. This shows just how low things have gotten in the West.
> > In a Western society worth of the name, these political schemers would
> > certainly be tried, but they would not be so for sex crimes. As far as
> > Whites are concerned, they would be tried, as well as their family,
> > for high treason.
> >
> > Incidentally, http://www.pehi.eu reveals itself in its true colours
> > when labeling an individual who once stated... "The future man will be
> > a mongrel. As for a Pan Europe, I wish to see there a Eurasian-Negroid
> > mixture with great variation in personality types (....) The Jews
> > shall take the leading positions, since good providence has given
> > Europe a spiritually superior race of nobility called the Jews."
> > ('Praktischer idealismus', 1925)... a Fascist
> > (http://www.pehi.eu/archives_2006.htm). Besides, one cannot but note
> > that, in the whole 'indictment', there is no mention of any females :
> > considering that the EU staff, as any other parasitic institution's in
> > the West, is increasingly feminine, and that the intrinsic corruption
> > of those mafia-like institutions is directly proportional to the
> > number of females in their staff, this 'omission' is rather
> > mouth-watering.
> >
>
> Indeed, most people do not realize or do not consider it important that
> organizations such as the CIA and Pentagon are staffed with a slight
> majority of female employees.
>
> However, I'm new to the Le Cercle information, but as someone that has
> been following the CFR and all the usual suspects over the years I
fail to
> see what is surprising about their activities? Also, considering the
> anti-communist agenda that their members played during the Cold War
era,
> what makes them insidious today, thay they are the hidden movers of the
> multicultural agenda of pan Europa? Even Evola called for an imperium
> Europa. Yes the EU is certainly a degenerate concoction, but is it
worse
> than the Soviet authorities of old, or the (Zionist allowed) victory of
> jihad 2.0?
>