Wow, I am surprised Evola did not understand the real vulgarity of
granting an interview to such subhuman anti-cultural filth like a
modern 'sex magazine' (especially like 'Playboy/men'), as this form
of anti-social vice and attack on the human spirit specifically
dehumanizes and preys on the naive and helpless White peasantry. As
is well-known, the gigantic modern pornographic industry is
dominated by parasitical Oriental-Levantine scum (cynical Judaics
and pre-Aryan Mediterranean slave-offal), whose purpose seems to be
the destruction of the healthy social and moral forms of the
traditional Indo-European world in a neo-Dionsyiac frenzy of
egalitarian nihilism.
I thought Evola dedicated his whole life to fight against such
quintessentially modern and cancerous things like "Playboy"; I
assumed this type of 'lunarism' would be ruthlessly stamped out in
his ideal state. Why would Evola even condescend to allow his name
to be associated with this Semitical trash and stained in such a
way? Is this something typical of him? What was his motivation? The
only work of his in my possession is "Revolt Against the Modern
World", and I cannot find any place in the text where Evola approves
of sexual decadence. Does he advocate sexual decadence in his other
works, in e.g. "The Metaphysics of Sex"? Perhaps I am a
victim of my own naivete and wishfulness. Guenon's assessment of the
possible irregularities in Evola's character seems not to have
entirely inaccurate.