It did not exactly headline. It was just 'Holocaust' business as usual.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n5p-6_Weber.html
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "Julius" wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> The question of forged "foto evidence" regarding certain historical events
> was widely discussed in Germany on the occasion of the
> Wehrmachtsausstellung, a touring exhibition in the years 1995 to 1999 and
> 2001 to 2004 to demonstrate war crimes allegedly commited by the
> German army during WW II. The unexpressed purpose of the exhibition was
> to revise the judgement of the Nuremberg Trials, which found that the
> Wehrmacht was not an inherently criminal organization, in contrast to
> other German organizations like the SS and the Waffen-SS.
>
> The falsities in this exhibition and the critzism on these grounds were so
> extensive that the display had to be suspended by its promoters in 1999. A
> "committee of historians" had to admit that "some of the exhibit's
> documentation had inaccuracies and that the arguments presented were
> too sweeping". The exhibition can be seen as a backlash for a certain way of
> evaluation and of depiction of certain historical events and the forces
> behind it.
>
> I would like to know if these events in connection with the
> Wehrmachtsausstellung attracted public attention and were reported in
> the (mass) media outside Germany.
>
>
>
> --- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "tlefranc10" wrote:
> >
> > I would like to share these two links for the benefit of the members of this
group: www.cluesforum.info and www.septemberclues.info
> >
> > They deal mainly with the "9/11 attacks" but also with other "terrorist
attacks" and "mass shootings".
> >
> > As for "9/11", the line of thought there is that no plane was destroyed and
that it was missiles that hit the towers. Another interesting claim is that not
many people actually died, perhaps a few dozens, the mass of the victims being
fake identities generated through morphing software and such. This would not be
surprising, given that the "counter-initiation" forces have managed to make
people believe much bigger things during the twentieth century. However, these
views are not the most attractive thing these two sites offer.
> >
> > What is really interesting about them is their extensive and exhaustive
analysis of photographs, videos and "storylines". I think that they have managed
to prove that many photos, videos and "storylines" have been faked – not only
for "9/11" but also for other "actions".
> >
> > Image and video manipulation is certainly a powerful weapon used in the
occult war waged against European peoples and, as such, it should be studied. It
is used in many fields and not only in the "important" ones, such as
geopolitics. For example, "humanitarian" organizations against "world hunger,
poverty, etc." are used to falsify the pictures and videos they show in their
marketing campaigns in order to reinforce the intended effects, i.e. that people
give more money and feel guiltier. Besides, the "fight" against "world hunger,
poverty, etc." is yet another way to promote globalism, as the fight against
"global warming" is.
> >
> > That is why I think these two sites contain worthy information. This
article, "Lying with pixels", written in 2000, is also worthy of interest:
http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/400734/lying-with-pixels/
> >
>