It might be not far-fetched. http://books.google.be/books?id=uuKfXsvfr2YC&pg=PA131&lpg=PA131&dq=obesity+cult&source=bl&ots=4AoF0JPQxT&sig=EKvisOqsJusmHpARuBF1271oOGc&hl=nl&sa=X&ei=dycaUbHFE-nD0QWoiYDQDA&ved=0CG8Q6AEwCA#v=onepage&q=obesity%20cult&f=false
But how does it relate to a genocidal agenda?
To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
From: evola_as_he_is@...
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:27:56 +0000
Subject: [evola_as_he_is] Re: An Eye is Not Always an Eye (was:Image and video manipulation in the occult war)
But how does it relate to a genocidal agenda?
To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
From: evola_as_he_is@...
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 11:27:56 +0000
Subject: [evola_as_he_is] Re: An Eye is Not Always an Eye (was:Image and video manipulation in the occult war)
We had never heard of such thing, nor had we seen any. We mean the `Hand of Fatima'. Before clicking on the link you kindly provided, and seeing it for the first time, we must say that what sprang to our mind upon reading about it was Mohammed's daughter and a famous Portuguese town.
Unsurprisingly, the web sites you borrowed the pictorial material from - that is, those which try to alert their fellow citizens about the `Free-Masonic' architecture of all major American buildings - do not see the ultimate implications of the spreading of such signs and symbols in the current context of our countries, let alone conspiracy theorists : to a large extent, the later's stodgy, scattered, sensationalistic, pieces distract one from a much bigger picture. Others, such as, for instance, http://matricien.org/ study matriarchy from a sympathetic, anti-patriarchal, eye. W. Bond, the author of the text we quoted the other day in relation to Free-Masonic imaging, and who turns out to be some sort of star in the Wicca `New Age' world (http://bardofely.hubpages.com/hub/Author-William-Bond-talks-about-matriachy-in-this-HubPage-interview), is a `matriarchist'.
On a related point, there might be an unsuspected underlying reason why slow poison is systematically prepared and sold as `food', `clothes', etc. on a large scale nowadays. What we have in mind in this respect is only a hypothesis, which we once took into Vandermok's confidence. It is quite bold, yet it is rigorously in keeping with the last consideration made by J. Evola in a chapter of `Sintesi di dottrina della razza' called `The mystery of birth – historical heredity and transcendent heredity' (in French at http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id97.html), which in turn stems from a perspicacious reading of pre-Christian Aryan teachings on birth : "It is not birth that determines people's nature, but conversely, it is people's nature – in the broadest sense, since, again, common parlance is treacherous – which determines birth." We may formulate this hypothesis later. Meanwhile, it may be partly induced from the following pathological phenomenon : the increasing prevalence of obesity in `Western' societies ; irrespective of the factors that cause it, one cannot but wonder, given the `shape' of those who suffer from obesity, whether the whole thing is connected with the clear intent to give life to the "monstruous steatopygic [carved clay, stone, or bone] female idols of the early megalithic period" (RATMM, p. 207), as representations of the "great Asiatic-Southern Chthonic goddesses", in their most grotesque 'forms'.(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Venus_von_Willendorf_01.jpg/185px-Venus_von_Willendorf_01.jpg)
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "rouesolaire" wrote:
>
> "for example, among the Berbers, it is seen both as a vulviform symbol of fertility and as a protecting eye."
>
> I guess this passage is referring, inter alia, to the hand of Fatima (http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/hand%20of%20fatima; http://perlbal.hi-pi.com/blog-images/238919/gd/1233428225/La-main-de-Fatima.jpg). This symbol can also be found in Kabbalistic ones and is named "Hamsa".
> http://www.kabbalah72.net/hamsa_hand_s/34.htm
> http://www.kabbalah72.net/Hamsa_Jewelry_s/76.htm
> http://www.squidoo.com/kabbalah-symbols
> http://www.myjewishlearning.com/beliefs/Issues/Magic_and_the_Supernatural/Practices_and_Beliefs/Amulets/Hamsa.shtml
> http://www.google.com/search?um=1&hl=fr&tbo=d&biw=1680&bih=890&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=red+string+evil+eye&btnG=
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=fr&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1680&bih=890&q=kabbalah+red+string+evil+eye
>
> Another kabbalistic amulet which is not a Hamsa: http://secretamulets.com/evil-eye-protection.html
>
Unsurprisingly, the web sites you borrowed the pictorial material from - that is, those which try to alert their fellow citizens about the `Free-Masonic' architecture of all major American buildings - do not see the ultimate implications of the spreading of such signs and symbols in the current context of our countries, let alone conspiracy theorists : to a large extent, the later's stodgy, scattered, sensationalistic, pieces distract one from a much bigger picture. Others, such as, for instance, http://matricien.org/ study matriarchy from a sympathetic, anti-patriarchal, eye. W. Bond, the author of the text we quoted the other day in relation to Free-Masonic imaging, and who turns out to be some sort of star in the Wicca `New Age' world (http://bardofely.hubpages.com/hub/Author-William-Bond-talks-about-matriachy-in-this-HubPage-interview), is a `matriarchist'.
On a related point, there might be an unsuspected underlying reason why slow poison is systematically prepared and sold as `food', `clothes', etc. on a large scale nowadays. What we have in mind in this respect is only a hypothesis, which we once took into Vandermok's confidence. It is quite bold, yet it is rigorously in keeping with the last consideration made by J. Evola in a chapter of `Sintesi di dottrina della razza' called `The mystery of birth – historical heredity and transcendent heredity' (in French at http://thompkins_cariou.tripod.com/id97.html), which in turn stems from a perspicacious reading of pre-Christian Aryan teachings on birth : "It is not birth that determines people's nature, but conversely, it is people's nature – in the broadest sense, since, again, common parlance is treacherous – which determines birth." We may formulate this hypothesis later. Meanwhile, it may be partly induced from the following pathological phenomenon : the increasing prevalence of obesity in `Western' societies ; irrespective of the factors that cause it, one cannot but wonder, given the `shape' of those who suffer from obesity, whether the whole thing is connected with the clear intent to give life to the "monstruous steatopygic [carved clay, stone, or bone] female idols of the early megalithic period" (RATMM, p. 207), as representations of the "great Asiatic-Southern Chthonic goddesses", in their most grotesque 'forms'.(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Venus_von_Willendorf_01.jpg/185px-Venus_von_Willendorf_01.jpg)
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "rouesolaire" wrote:
>
> "for example, among the Berbers, it is seen both as a vulviform symbol of fertility and as a protecting eye."
>
> I guess this passage is referring, inter alia, to the hand of Fatima (http://www.tumblr.com/tagged/hand%20of%20fatima; http://perlbal.hi-pi.com/blog-images/238919/gd/1233428225/La-main-de-Fatima.jpg). This symbol can also be found in Kabbalistic ones and is named "Hamsa".
> http://www.kabbalah72.net/hamsa_hand_s/34.htm
> http://www.kabbalah72.net/Hamsa_Jewelry_s/76.htm
> http://www.squidoo.com/kabbalah-symbols
> http://www.myjewishlearning.com/beliefs/Issues/Magic_and_the_Supernatural/Practices_and_Beliefs/Amulets/Hamsa.shtml
> http://www.google.com/search?um=1&hl=fr&tbo=d&biw=1680&bih=890&tbm=isch&sa=1&q=red+string+evil+eye&btnG=
> http://www.google.com/search?hl=fr&site=imghp&tbm=isch&source=hp&biw=1680&bih=890&q=kabbalah+red+string+evil+eye
>
> Another kabbalistic amulet which is not a Hamsa: http://secretamulets.com/evil-eye-protection.html
>