Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

rouesolaire · rouesolaire@yahoo.fr | Group Member  - Edit Membership Start a Group | My Groups
evola_as_he_is · EVOLA AS HE IS

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 121
  • Category: Spirituality
  • Founded: Nov 19, 2004
  • Language: English

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Message search is now enhanced, find messages faster. Take it for a spin.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Not really so strange   Topic List   < Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Reply  |  Next Message > 
Not really so strange

Just as it is being deliberately contracted, so it was just as
deliberately and artificially expanded.

To quote Mayer Amschel Rothschild : "Give me control of a nation's
money and I care not who makes the laws."

To quote Nathan Mayer Rothschild : "I care not what puppet is placed
on the throne of England to rule the Empire, ...The man that controls
Britain's money supply controls the British Empire. And I control the
money supply."

Some of the considerations made on 'The Protocols' in the well-known
'Holly Blood, Holly Grail' are not devoid of interest :

"The role of Rasputin at the court of Nicholas and Alexandra of Russia
is more or less generally known. It is not generally known, however,
that there were influential, even powerful esoteric enclaves at the
Russian court long before Rasputin. During the 1890's and 1900's one
such enclave formed itself around an individual known as Monsieur
Philippe, and around his mentor, who made periodic visits to the
imperial court at Petersburg. And Monsieur Phillippe's mentor was none
other than the man called Papus - the French esotericist associated
with Jules Doinel (founder of the neo-Cathar church in the Languedoc),
Peladan (who claimed to have discovered Jesus's tomb), Emma Calve and
Claude Debussy. In a word, the 'French occult revival' of the late
nineteenth century had not only spread to Petersburg. Its
representatives also enjoyed the privledged status of personal
confidents to the czar and czarina.

However, the esoteric enclave of Papus and Monsieur Philippe was
actively opposed by certain other powerful interests - the Grand
Duchess Elizabeth, for example, who was intent on installing her own
favourites in proximity to the imperial throne. One of the grand
duchess's favourites was a rather contemptible individual known to
posterity under the pseudonym of Sergei Nilus. Sometime around 1903
Nilus presented a highly controversial document to the czar - a
document that supposedly bore witness to a dangerous conspiracy. But
if Nilus expected the czar's gratitude for his disclosure, he must
have been grievously disappointed. THE CZAR [as mentionned by J. Evola
in his introduction to the Italian version of 'The Protocols']
DECLARED THE DOCUMENT TO BE AN OUTRAGEOUS FABRICATION, and ordered all
copies of it to be destroyed. And Nilus was banished from the court in
disgrace.

Of course the document - or, at any rate, a copy of it - survived. In
1903 it was serialised in a newspaper but failed to attract any
interest. In 1905 it was published again - this time as an appendix to
a book by a distinguished mystical, Vladimir Soloviov. At this point
it began to attract attention. In the years that followed it became
one of the single most infamous documents of the twentieth century.

(...)

Modern scholars have established in fact that the Protocols, in their
published form, are based at least in part on a satirical work written
and printed in Geneva in 1864, The work was composed as an attack on
Napoleon III by a man named Maurice Joly, who was subsequently
imprisoned. Joly is said to have been a member of a Rose Croix order.
Whether this is true or not, he was a friend of Victor Hugo; and Hugo,
who shared Joly's antipathy to Napoleon III, was a member of a
Rose-Croix order.

It can thus be proved conclusively that the Protocols did not issue
from the Judaic Congress at Basle in 1897. That being so, the obvious
question is whence they did issue. Modern scholars have dismissed them
as a total forgery, a wholly spurious document concocted by
anti-Semitic interests intent in discrediting Judaism. And yet the
Protocols themselves argue strongly against such a conclusion. They
contain, for example, a number of enigmatic references - references
that are clearly not Judaic. But these references are so clearly not
Judaic that they cannot plausibly have been fabricated by a forger
either. No anti-Semitic forger with even a modicum of intelligence
would possibly have concocted such references in order to discredit
Judaism. For no one would have believed these references to be of
Judaic origin.

Thus for instance, the text of the Protocols ends with a single
statement, 'Signed by the representatives of Sion of the 33rd Degree'.

Why would an anti-Semitic forger have made up such a statement? Why
would he not have attempted to incriminate all Jews, rather than just
a few - the few who constitute 'the representatives of Sion of the
33rd Degree'? Why would he not declare that the document was signed
by, say, the representatives of the international Jewish conspiracy'.
If anything, it would seem to refer to something specifically Masonic.
And the 33rd Degree in Freemasonry is that of the so-called 'Ancient
and Accepted Scottish Rite' which emerges mysteriously out of French
Freemasonry in the mid eighteenth century.

The Protocols contain other even more flagrant anomalies. The text
speaks repeatedly, for example, of the advent of a 'Masonic Kingdom',
and a 'King of the blood of Sion', who will preside over this 'Masonic
Kingdom'. It asserts that the future king will be of the 'dynastic
roots of King David'. It affirms that 'the King of the Jews will be
the real Pope' and 'the patriarch of an international church'. And it
concludes in a most cryptic fashion, 'Certain members of the seed of
David will prepare the Kings and their heirs... Only the King and the
three who stood sponsor for him will know what is coming'.

As an expression of Judaic thought, real or fabricated, such
statements are blatantly absurd. Since Biblical times no king has
figured in Judaic tradition, and the very principle of kingship has
become utterly irrelevent. The concept of a king would have been as
meaningless to Jews of 1897 as it would be to Jews today; and no
forger can have been ignorant of this fact. Indeed the references
quoted would appear to be more Christian than Judaic. For the last two
millennia the only 'King of the Jews' has been Jesus himself - and
Jesus, according to the Gospels, was of the 'dynastic roots of David'.
If one is fabricating a document and ascribing it to a Jewish
conspiracy, why include such patently Christian echoes? Why speak of
so specificallly and uniquely Christian a concept as a pope? Why speak
of an 'international church' rather than an international synagogue or
an international temple? And why include the enigmatic allusion to
'the King and the three who stood sponsor' - which is less suggestive
of Judaism and Christianity than it is of the secret societies of
Johann Valentin Andrea and Charles Nodier? If the Protocols issued
wholly from a propagandist's anti-Semitic imagination, it is difficult
to imagine a propagandist so inept, or so ignorant and uninformed.

On the basis of prolonged and systematic research, we reached certain
conclusions about the Protocols of the Elders of Sion. They are as
follows :


1) There was an original text on which the published version the
Protocols was based. This original text was not a forgery. On the
contrary it was authentic. But it had nothing whatever to do with
Judaism or an 'international Jewish conspiracy'. It was issued rather
from some Masonic organisation or Masonically oriented secret society
which incorporated the word 'Sion'.

2) The original text on thich the published version of the Protocols
was based need not have been provocative or inflammatory in its
language. But it may well have included a programme for gaining power,
for infiltrating Freemasonry, for controlling social, political and
economic institutions. Such a programme would have been perfectly in
keeping with the secret societies of the Renaisance, as well as with
the Compagnie du Saint-Sacrement and the institutions of Andrea and
Nodier.

3) The original text on which the published version of the Protocols
was based fell into the hands of Sergei Nilus. Nilus did not first
intend it to discredit Judaism. On the contrary, he brought it to the
czar with the intention of discrediting the esoteric enclave at the
imperial court - the enclave of Papus, Monsier Philippe and others who
were members of the secret society in question. Before doing so, he
almost certainly doctored the language, rendering it far more venemous
and inflammatory than it initially was. When the czar spurned him,
Nilus then released the Protocols in their doctored form for
publication. They had failed in their primary objective of
compromising Papus and Monsieur Philippe. But they might still serve a
secondary purpose - that of fostering anti-Semitism. Although Nilus's
chief targets had been Papus and Monsieur Philipe, he was hostile to
Judaism as well.

4) The published version of the Protocols is not, therefore, a totally
fabricated text. It is rather a radically altered text. But despite
the alterations certain vestiges of the original version can be
discerned - as in a palimpsest, or as in passages of the Bible. These
vestiges - which referred to a king, a pope, an international church,
and to Sion - probably meant little or nothing to Nilus. He certainly
would not have invented them himself. But if they were already there,
he would have had no reason, given his ignorance, to excise them. And
while such vestiges might have been irrelevent to Judaism, they might
have been extremely relevent to a secret society. As we learned
subsequently, they were - and still are - of paramount importance to
the Prieure de Sion."

Whose members, we are told a few pages further, are, for some of them,
"if not indeed many, (...) Jewish", some of them having changed their
names to obscure their Jewish origins.





--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "ignisaeraquaterra"
<tristanarpe@...> wrote:
>
> As the world's usurious financial system is being intentionally
> being contracted, only to be replaced by a more heinous system one
> really need not go any further without at least giving a by-word to
> the infamous "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" (see protocol six).
>
> Now, it has been proven that the documents themselves are
> plagiarised forgeries, but what group leaves behind secret documents
> and to what benefit?
>
> And one can also ask do the protocols only serve those who they were
> plagiarised to victimise?
>
> See, Jewish author Cohn. N, (2001) "Warrant for Genocide" for a
> discrediting perspective and "The Waters Flowing Eastwards" by L.
> FRY edited and revised by The Rev. Denis Fahey (1988) Flanders Hall
> for a pro-libel account.
>
> The protocols themselves were copies of two earlier texts uncovered
> by Henri Rollin which the tsarist police fabricated under the then
> Russian minister of interior, von Plehve one by Maurice Joly and
> another by Ilya Tsion.
>
> Curiously, Cohn in his book makes no reference to the Jew Jacob
> Venedy whilst he's explicit about Joly's "Dialogue aux Enfers entre
> Machiavel et Montesquieu" (1861) a satire of Napoleon III reign.
>
> Whereas, Joly's version is plagiarised copy of Venedy's "Dialogue
> entre Machiavel et Montesquieu" published in 1850 by Franz Duncker
> at Berlin.
>
> It is curious that theses supposed fabricators Venedey and Joly were
> convicted of subversion only to be protected by Grand Mason and Jew
> Adolph Israel Cremieux (Grand Master of the Grand Orient and
> Alliance Israélite Universelle).
>





Sun Dec 7, 2008 6:10 pm

evola_as_he_is
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 |  Next Message > 
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

As the world's usurious financial system is being intentionally being contracted, only to be replaced by a more heinous system one really need not go any...
ignisaeraquaterra
ignisaeraqua... Offline Send Email
Dec 7, 2008
3:46 pm

Just as it is being deliberately contracted, so it was just as deliberately and artificially expanded. To quote Mayer Amschel Rothschild : "Give me control of...
evola_as_he_is Offline Send Email Dec 7, 2008
6:11 pm

Copyright © 2012 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Guidelines NEW - Help