Skip to search.

Breaking News Visit Yahoo! News for the latest.

×Close this window

rouesolaire · rouesolaire@yahoo.fr | Group Member  - Edit Membership Start a Group | My Groups
evola_as_he_is · EVOLA AS HE IS

The Yahoo! Groups Product Blog

Check it out!

Group Information

  • Members: 121
  • Category: Spirituality
  • Founded: Nov 19, 2004
  • Language: English

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Real people. Real stories. See how Yahoo! Groups impacts members worldwide.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
The Ambiguous European Elite Myth : More   Topic List   < Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Reply  |  Next Message > 
The Ambiguous European Elite Myth : More

Hello,

We are not unfamiliar with these texts or, more precisely, with the
heterogeneous data which are mixed in them. Some of these elements,
considered in isolation, such as the whole of the logos which
constitute the E.U. imagery, only confirm that the E.U. is of a
gynaecocratic nature, as pointed out and explained in one of our
previous posts.

However, to the very best of our knowledge, it is the first
conspirationist text which dares to quote Julius Evola, going so far
as to use some of his political views to defend the thesis according
to which the E.U. would be the heir of the Holy Roman Empire, and,
while it is at it, of the Roman Empire. The quotations are all taken
from 'Men among the Ruins'.

The first is: "(...) in the interpretation of the genesis of
historical nations, we shouldn't forget what as essentially due to
dynasties representing a tradition, and to the loyalty that was
created around them (...)" (we may add "(as in the birth of
Prussia)", since this was precisely the example given by Evola to
make his point, and, for some reasons not unknown to us, the
journalist who wrote this article didn't find it relevant to quote
him thoroughly). Do the representatives of the European nobility who
are in session at the parliament in Brussels following their being
elected democratically as European deputies represent European
tradition, which is a monarchic one?

The second quotation is: "European unity would always be precarious
if it leaned on some external factor, like an international
parliament lacking a common authority... Only elites of individual
European nations could understand one another and coordinate their
work, overcoming every particularism and spirit of division,
asserting higher interests and motives with their authority. In other
times, it was royalty... who could make the great European policy;
they regarded each other almost as members of the same family (which,
in part, they were, due to dynastic intermarriages), even when grave
conflicts temporarily arose between their peoples". Is the E.U. a
monarchy?

The third quotation is: "We could suggest the idea of an order, whose
members would act in the various nations, doing what they can to
promote an eventual European unity...A first group should be composed
of members of ancient European families that are still 'standing',
and who are valuable not only because of the name they carry, but
also because of who they are, because of their personality." Who is,
for instance, Otto von Habsburg? Otto von Habsburg, the offshoot of
the last ruling emperor of a royal family whose members fought the
Ottomans for more than half a millennia and thus prevented Europe
from being Islamised, has been lobbying and lobbied for years for the
admission of Turkey into the E.U.: in other words, a traitor. A
traitor lacking in personality, as his father, as prince Bernhard,
one of the two main aristocratic alibis, with, precisely, Otto von
Habsburg, used by the representatives of the forces of subversion to
hide their plebeian, if not Jewish, origin.

Incidentally, we would like to remind to those who are misled by the
expression 'Black nobility' that Jews started entering the ranks of
the European nobility as early as the 17th century in England,
Russia, Austria, Italy, Spain. In anticipation, they started using
coats of arms as far back as the 14th century, as they were
infiltrating European courts. The 'Court Jew' emerged in the 17th
century in Central and Northern Europe. Kings and sovereigns of the
German states found it to their advantage to attach to their service
a Jewish banker or trader who could quickly marshal money and
equipment in war-time, in a Europe torn apart by religious wars, that
is by the schism of the Abrahamic religion which had been introduced
into Europe sixteen centuries before, namely Christianity. Samuel
Oppenheimer, nicknamed in his time 'Judenkaiser', was then the most
famous Court Jew: ironically enough, he provided financial help at
the time of the Turkish siege of Vienna in 1683 and, when he died,
the Emperor refused to pay his debts. The most famous example is the
Rothschilds, who were rewarded after Waterloo for having provided
financial services to Austria. At the suggestion of count Stodion,
the Austrian finance minister, they were ennobled (except Nathan,
since he was a foreign subject): as a way to get better interest
rates on a loan...In the 18th century, William III knighted Solomon
de Medina, a Dutch banker, for the same reason: for having helped him
finance his campaigns. The first Jewish baronet in Great Britain was
Isaac Lyon Goldsmid in 1841. The second Jewish baronet there was Sir
Moses Montefiore in 1846.

And so on.

Finally, the Jews started to buy European nobility in the 19th
century by marrying in the ruined old aristocracy (the "noblesse
d'épée") or, failing that, by buying titles.

We were told by an acquaintance of us who met Evola a few years
before his death that, at that time, he planned to send some kind of
questionnaire to the members of the old aristocracy to check whether
they were still 'standing'. Apparently, this questionnaire was never
sent.

Thompkins&Cariou





--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, "Rowan Berkeley"
<rowan_berkeley@y...> wrote:
> Anyone who has grasped my point about the strategic or dialectical
> ambiguity of the European elite myth, will also enjoy these two
> articles by Tracy Trailerpark (as some call her) - otherwise Tracy
> Twyman. This young lady is the ex companion of Boyd Rice and is
> currently involved with Prince Nicholas de Vere Drakenberg, aka
Nick
> Weir, adventurer and confidence trickster by self-appointment.
> Because of her pedestrian mind and propensity towards either/or
> thinking, Tracy's work is surprisingly useful. References to the
> Nephilim will be found sparsely scattered within these articles but
> the Nephilim myth underlies the Merovingian one, here as in all
> radically post Baigent/Leigh productions.
> http://www.dragonkeypress.com/articles/article_2004_10_26_3541.html
> http://www.dragonkeypress.com/articles/article_2004_10_26_2914.html







Thu May 19, 2005 8:34 pm

evola_as_he_is
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email
 |  Next Message > 
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Anyone who has grasped my point about the strategic or dialectical ambiguity of the European elite myth, will also enjoy these two articles by Tracy...
Rowan Berkeley
rowan_berkeley Offline Send Email
May 19, 2005
12:12 pm

Hello, We are not unfamiliar with these texts or, more precisely, with the heterogeneous data which are mixed in them. Some of these elements, considered in...
evola_as_he_is Offline Send Email May 19, 2005
8:36 pm

Copyright © 2012 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Copyright Policy - Guidelines NEW - Help