Liberties must be taken with the strict application of a necessary rule for the proper functionning of a forum of this kind. They are taken because of the unprecedented nature of a document to which my attention has been drawn a few days ago by Tlefranc. It can be found at http://www.galzu.info/index.php?post/2015/11/30/attentats_de_paris_operation_psy_et_mensonge_sous_faux_drapeau. It is a synthetic montage, accompanied by critical comments (in French) of the person who made it, of footage, critically reviewed (in English) but various other « conspiracy theorists », of the available scenes of the festival which was heavily held in Paris lately in honour of Isis.
For the past 15 years, all major terrorist attacks in the « West » have been characterised by a theatricality which is completely lacking in the actual bloodsheds that occur regularly in the Near- and Middle-East, and by a definite liturgy, in which conspiracy theorists spot tons of inconsistencies - the famous « red flags ». Each of these terror attacks is reported to be a « false flag » attack. Of course, all of these terror attacks are false flag attacks. This question does not even arise, when one is aware of the nature and of the ultimate aim of top political schemers in office in « Western' » countries, and of their bosses.
The staging grows more and more obvious. The latest is so obvious that one cannot help wondering whether it is intentional. You have probably watched the video shot by a journalist conveniently living in a flat on the street behind the concert hall (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HisrANxr5HM), seen, among other circus acts, that woman hanging by her hands from the window sill of a flat located at the rear of the concert hall, and wondered whether you were seeing things (equally rocambolesque, albeit far less dramaticised, is the little game played – by one or two acrobats - at the top-right window, which, precisely because it is more restrained, has received no attention)
What you may not have heard is that « she can be heard shouting: “Help, help, I’m pregnant (http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/nov/17/paris-attacks-man-helped-pregnant-woman-hanging-from-window-of-bataclan) catch me if I fall” (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zvqg1-700L4 ; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z0gxNoJjUYY; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_tgXOdYjzgI, etc.), to someone who has not been identified, but who, given the height at which she was perched, must either have been, just after escaping death, assailed by suicidal thoughts, or have, either overestimated greatly, either his own muscular strength, or underestimated heavily the weight of a body falling from that kind of height.
A few weeks later, a French journalist interviewed this aerialist, who, in the meantime, had miraculously, mediatically changed sex : the person hanging from the window sill of the flat located at the rear of the concert hall was no longer a woman, but a man, a Chilean journalist based in Paris. His account smacks of the Benny Hill Show: « When the terrorist saw me (in the room of the flat), he pointed a gun at me, asked me to go down (through the window), and told me : 'I hope you're alone, otherwise I'll kill you. I've just killed 100 people, and (he, too, is well-read) you won't make a difference.' » In other words, the one who pointed a gun at him, instead of doing again to him what he had purportedly just done to 100 people, that is, to shoot him, asked him to commit suicide. Indeed, it does not sound like the terrorist thought that the Chilean journalist who was standing in front of him was David himself (1 Samuel 19:12 ).
Was it a case of collective amnesia ? Had the whole staff of the newspaper, had the « Chilean journalist » himself, forgotten that he had first been described across the media as a « three-month pregnant woman », whose boyfriend did not know she was expecting until he saw the video of her begging people below to catch her » (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3321829/Boyfriend-woman-seen-hanging-Bataclan-window-ledge-Paris-terror-attack-did-not-know-pregnant-saw-video-begging-people-catch-her.html) ? Was this a faux pas, due to a shortcoming that we are not used to from media : a lack of coordination ? It is not impossible : if to err is human, it is even more so subhuman. Why would it be deliberate ? Let us not underestimate the twistedness of those who master-mind that kind of operation, nor the exhibitionist substance of their slavish minds. Primary psychopaths are known for their propensity to manifest exhibitionism.
Objectively, this apparent blunder could be explained by the need for the pseudo-elite's henchmen to keep conspirationnists busy, and therefore to make sure its propaganda keep being spread among dissenters. Slogans like « the exploitation of Islam » or « the demonisation of Islam », the sanctity of democracy, and, on a more practical level, the announcement made in the aftermath of the latest so-called terrorist attacks in Paris that the border crossings had been been closed and « the reception of migrants » halted, etc., there are none of the ideological rallying cries in the propaganda machine of the occupying forces, none of the humanitarian anti-White media headlines cooked up by communicators, that are not taken up sanctimoniously by the conspirationnist « community ».
The slogan : « the exploitation of Islam » is particularly insidious, and, therefore, effective, when trumpetted to half-brained and half-bred, for two reasons, of which only one is generally grasped. The first reason is that it gives the impression that the « West » and Islam are objective ennemies, when the roots of the ideology of the largely non-White pseudo-elite in control of « western » countries lie in the semitic ground of abrahamic religions, and, at a deeper level, of pre-Abrahamic Mother Goddess cults. It is not to say that the issue of « exploitation » does not arise; it does, but on a different level: some Muslims are indeed used for destructive purposes - but this does not mean in any way that Islam as an ideology is used as a tool ; quite the contrary, as we have just seen (Isis is far more ancient than the FBI) ; however, no one in European nationalists milieux is able to draw this necessary distinction, whereby even the most anti-Muslim nationalists end up, nolens volens, clearing Islam. Whenever – and this is the second point – a nationalist uses the expression « Islam is used as a tool » (instead of saying that « some Muslims are used as tools »), which is used by some Muslims, too (with good reason), he falls into one of the numerous semantic traps set, following the taqiya principle, by Globalists, whether Muslim or « western » Globalists, in that the magic spell has been cast, which exonerates Islam. Basically, it works as an absolution formula,
Attention: Starting December 14, 2019 Yahoo
Groups will no longer host user created content on its sites. New
content can no longer be uploaded after October 28, 2019.
Sending/Receiving email functionality is not going away, you can
continue to communicate via any email client with your group members. Learn More
evola_as_he_is@{{emailDomain}}