We could start an ideological debate on this list about the Romanov, a
royal family who, as many other European royal families did as early
as the Middle-Ages, made the mistake of entrusting Jews with the
management of their property, or, more exactly, of entrusting them
with this care without watching them closely. Do not think for a
second you'll be able to entice us into that trap. Needless to read
St. Tikhon of Zadonsky's pamphlets to be aware that ruling houses of
Europe were led to think at some point that they belonged to the
Davidic line. The attitude and spirit of European ruling houses was
criticised harshly in a famous book published in two parts
respectively in 1925 and in 1926 by a man who, for the first time in
two thousands years, fought the Jew on the racial plane, and not on
the plane to which the latter tries to attract goyim's attention, that
is, on the religious plane. This judgment on European ruling Houses,
in this respect, is our point of reference, despite the fact that
Evola disagrees with it to a large extent.
As far as Eustace Mullins is concerned, we have already pointed out
some of the limitations of his point of view on the Jewish problem.
What's remarkable about his 'Rothschild' is that he doesn't even need
to express his point of view in it, but merely reports facts, and is
wise enough to let facts speak for themselves - Ezra Pound is not
quoted once. Mullins' 'Rothschild' is a brilliant synthesis of pieces
of information taken from books and articles written on this mob. It
ensues from this that those you should be showering with sarcasm are
the journalists and the writers, for example those of 'The New York
Times', who wrote those books and articles, and not him who compiled
them brilliantly.
The third chapter of 'Three Aspects of the Jewish Problem' is called
'The Economic and Social Aspect'.
Rest assured that you'll be the first to know when/if it is published
in cartoons, together with Mullins' 'Rothschild'.
--- In evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com, caleb afendopoulo
<afendopoulo@...> wrote:
>
> The link on your message seems not to work. Can it be corrected?
> It would be interesting to know where the Czar had amassed so much
cash and seemingly saw it necessary to "guard" it outside his own domain.
> Another curious point, the Czar was an " out and out" Christian who
considered his dynasty to be "The Anointed Sovereigns" of the Davidic
line.{From a two page pamphlet printed by St. Tikhon of Zadonsky
Society Publication in my possesion.}
> It is difficult for me to understand how this is "The Third Aspect
Of The Jewish Problem" when the raison d'etre of the Czar is his
"continuation" on the Davidic kingdom.
> As far as Eustace Mullins's 'Rothschild', Mr. Mullin's opinions are
rather rabid, he even signs from"occupied Virginia" and having been
Ezra Pound's secretary it seems that in this specific case mental
deformity was airborne , Mullin being infected.
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: evola_as_he_is <evola_as_he_is@...>
> To: evola_as_he_is@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2007 8:20:14 PM
> Subject: [evola_as_he_is] The Third Aspect Of The Jewish Problem
>
>